- Home
- Medicine in Exercise and Sport
- Health Care in Exercise and Sport
- Athletic Training and Therapy
- Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine
Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine
Concussion and Other Nervous System Injuries in the Athlete
by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes and Arthur L. Day
416 Pages
Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine: Concussion and Other Nervous System Injuries in the Athlete presents techniques for diagnosis and treatment of head-related injuries to enable medical professionals to provide the best care possible. Authored by a respected team of neurosurgeons, including highly regarded concussion researcher Julian Bailes, this evidence-based reference offers expert guidelines for managing these serious injuries.
A strong focus is placed on concussion due to the risk involved with this common injury. The text outlines how to recognize, assess, and treat concussions, preparing practitioners to calmly respond to athletes who are exhibiting signs of this dangerous condition. It also reviews the biomechanics and pathophysiology at the core of concussions to better understand their clinical presentations.
Critical return-to-play guidelines and participation recommendations for patients with preexisting neurological conditions or structural lesions arm medical professionals with the principles needed for making appropriate decisions for athletes’ safety. The text explains the roles of pharmacological management, natural treatment approaches, rehabilitation strategies, and education. In addition, chapters provide coverage of postconcussion syndrome, subconcussion, and second-impact syndrome.
Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine also takes a look at other traumatic injuries, including injuries to the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine, and the soft tissue and fascia within the spinal unit. It provides an overview of peripheral nervous system injuries to ensure medical professionals understand those serious and potentially career-ending issues, reviews facets of optimal response with suspected or proven spinal injury, and discusses the evaluation and management of athletes with non-concussion-related headaches and heat illness or heatstroke. The text includes additional features to address issues surrounding critical injuries:
• Guidance on developing an action plan for athletic events prepares first responders for emergency situations.
• A review of cases of interest provides examples of situations that can—and do—occur.
• Medicolegal considerations educate practitioners about negligence, standard of care, and proximate cause.
• More than 150 photos and illustrations offer visual support to further explain the injuries.
The evaluation and management of sport-related neurological injuries have matured at an unprecedented rate. Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine is a critical resource for all who encounter and treat neurological injuries, providing the foundation for the clinical decisions that all athletic medical practitioners must make to give their patients the best treatment possible.
Continuing education credits and units may also be earned based on the subject matter in this book. Explore online CE course options in Human Kinetics’ Continuing Education store.
Part 1: General Concepts
Chapter 1. Athletes and Neurological Injuries: A View From 10,000 Feet
A Stroll Through History
The Present
Spectrum of Neurological Injury in Sports
Concluding Thoughts
References
Chapter 2. Medicolegal Considerations in Neurological Sports Medicine
With Increased Awareness Comes Increased Scrutiny
The King of Concussions
Negligence
Duty and Breach
Violation of a Statutory Duty
Standard of Care Defined by Experts
Standard of Care Established Through Literature, Rules, Protocols and Textbooks
Good Samaritan Laws
Proximate Cause
Assumption of the Risk
Theories of Negligence
Cases of Interest
NFL and NCAA Concussion Litigation Concluding Thoughts
References
Chapter 3. Having a Game Plan
Developing an Emergency Action Plan
Caring for Athletic Injuries Responsibilities of Host and Visiting Medical Staff
Concluding Thoughts
References
Part 2: Sport-Related Head Injuries
Chapter 4. Biomechanics, Pathophysiology, and Classification of Concussion
Biomechanics and Basic Concepts
Lessons Learned From Football
Lessons Learned From Other Sports
Pathophysiology of Concussion
Classification of Concussion and Grading Systems
Concluding Thoughts
References
Chapter 5. In the Trenches: Acute Evaluation and Management of Concussion
Presentation
Acute Evaluation
Concluding Thoughts
References
Chapter 6. Neuroimaging and Neurophysiological Studies in the Head-Injured Athlete
Standard Neuroimaging
Advanced Structural Techniques
Advanced Functional Techniques
Neurophysiological Techniques
Concluding Thoughts
References
Chapter 7. Neuropsychological Assessment in Concussion
Use of Symptom Checklists
Value of Neuropsychological Assessment of Concussion
Issues With Computerized Assessments
Other Considerations
Other Issues Addressed by Neuropsychologists in the Assessment of Concussed Patients
Concluding Thoughts
References
Chapter 8. Role of Balance Testing and Other Adjunct Measures in Concussion
Balance Assessment in Concussion
Emerging Technology and Future Directions for Adjunct Measures of Assessment in Concussion
Concluding Thoughts
References
Chapter 9. Postconcussion Syndrome
What’s in a Definition
Scope of the Problem
A Neuroanatomical Substrate for Prolonged Symptoms
Psychogenesis of PCS and PPCS
A Modern Conceptual Framework for PCS and PPCS
Concluding Thoughts
References
Chapter 10. Neuropathology of Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy
Definition of Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy
Posttraumatic Encephalopathy Versus Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy
Gross Morphology and Histomorphology of Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy
Concluding Thoughts
References
Chapter 11. The Emerging Role of Subconcussion
A Working Definition
Laboratory Evidence of Subconcussive Effects
Clinical Evidence of Subconcussion
Concluding Thoughts
References
Chapter 12. Severe Head Injury and Second Impact Syndrome
Cerebral Contusions and Intraparenchymal
Hemorrhage Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subdural Hematoma
Skull Fractures
Epidural Hematoma
Diffuse Axonal Injury
Arterial Dissection and Stroke
Fatalities
Other Posttraumatic Sequelae
Second Impact Syndrome
Concluding Thoughts
References
Chapter 13. Neurological Considerations in Return to Sport Participation
History of Return to Play
Symptom Complex and Identification
Return to Play and Brain Abnormalities
Addressing and Resolving Return to Play Issues
Concluding Thoughts
References
Chapter 14. The Role of Pharmacological Therapy and Rehabilitation in Concussion
The Decision to Treat Pharmacologically
Somatic Symptoms
Sleep Disturbance Symptoms
Emotional Symptoms
Cognitive Symptoms
The Role of Rehabilitation in Concussion Management
Concluding Thoughts
References
Chapter 15. The Research Behind Natural Neuroprotective Approaches to Concussion
Eicosapentaenoic Acid and Docosahexaenoic Acid
Curcumin
Resveratrol
Creatine
Green Tea
Caffeine
Vitamins E and C
Vitamin D
Scutellaria baicalensis
Examples of Other Neuroprotective Nutraceuticals
Another Natural Approach: Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy
Concluding Thoughts
Concluding Thoughts
References
Part 3: Sport-Related Injuries of the Spine and Peripheral Nervous System
Chapter 16. Cervical, Thoracic, and Lumbar Spine Injuries: Types, Causal Mechanisms, and Clinical Features
Background and Epidemiology
Normal Anatomy
Types of Tissue Injuries and Neurologic Syndromes
Common Cervical Injuries and Conditions
Common Thoracic Injuries
Common Lumbar Injuries
Concluding Thoughts
References
Chapter 17. Management of Spine Injuries, Including Rehabilitation, Surgical Considerations, and Return to Play
On-the-Field Assessment
Radiological Assessment
Treatment and Rehabilitation
Surgical Considerations
Cervical Spine Injuries and Their Management and Treatment
Cervical Spine Injury: Return to Play
Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Injuries and Their Management
Concluding Thoughts
Chapter 18. Peripheral Nerve Injuries in Athletes
Epidemiology
Pathogenesis
Clinical Evaluation
Additional Testing
Management Rationale
Surgical Options: Primary Nerve Surgery
Surgical Options: Secondary Surgery (Soft Tissue or Bony Reconstruction)
Postoperative Management and Return to Play
Legal Implications
Concluding Thoughts
References
Part 4: Other Sport-Related Neurological Issues
Chapter 19. Headaches in Athletics
Clinical Approach and Assessment
Commonly Recognized Headache Syndromes Coincidental to Sporting Activity
Prolonged Sporting Activity as a Trigger for Commonly Recognized Headache Syndromes
Primary Exertional Headache
Headaches Attributed to Head or Neck Trauma
Headaches Attributed to Sport-Specific Mechanisms
Concluding Thoughts
References
Chapter 20. Heat Illness in Sports
Background
Contributory Factors in Heat Illness
Prevention
The Spectrum of Heat Illness and Management
Return to Play
Concluding Thoughts
References
Anthony L. Petraglia, MD, graduated from the University of Chicago in 2002 with a BA in neuroscience and earned his medical degree from the University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry in 2007. He completed his residency in neurological surgery at the University of Rochester Medical Center in 2014. Petraglia was the first neurosurgery resident to complete a neurological sports medicine fellowship, and is currently an attending neurosurgeon at Unity Health System in Rochester, New York, where he is also the director of the concussion program.
Petraglia has presented nationally and internationally on neurological sports medicine, has published numerous manuscripts and book chapters on various aspects of neurological surgery, and performs editorial duties for several medical journals. His membership in professional organizations includes the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS), and he has served as an assistant to the Sports Medicine Section of the AANS/CNS. He has worked as a physician with several collegiate and high school football teams, as a neurosurgical consultant for the Webster Youth Sports Council, and as a medical director for cyclocross racing.
Julian E. Bailes, Jr., MD, earned a BS from from Louisiana State University in 1978, and his MD from Louisiana State University School of Medicine in New Orleans in 1982. He completed a general surgery internship at Northwestern Memorial Hospital in 1983 and a neurological surgery residency at Northwestern University in Chicago in 1987, as well as a fellowship in cerebrovascular surgery at the Barrow Neurological Institute in Phoenix.
Bailes was director of cerebrovascular surgery at Allegheny General Hospital in Pittsburgh from 1988 until 1997 and later at Celebration Health Hospital in Orlando, where he also was the director of emergency medical services at both the city and county levels. In 2000, Bailes assumed the position of professor and chair in the department of neurosurgery at West Virginia University School of Medicine in Morgantown. He most recently assumed the position of chair of the department of neurosurgery at NorthShore University Health System in Chicago and is co-director of the Neurological Institute.
Bailes is a past chair of the Sports Medicine Section for the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. He has more than 100 publications concerning various aspects of neurological surgery, including three books on neurological sports medicine, and performs editorial duties for numerous medical journals. He is an internationally recognized expert on neurological athletic injuries and has been a team physician at either the National Football League (NFL) or collegiate level for more than 20 years. Since 1992, he has been the neurological consultant to the NFL Players’ Association (NFLPA), which has sponsored his research on the effects of head injuries on professional athletes. He is the director of the NFLPA’s Second Opinion Network. He is the medical director of the Center for Study of Retired Athletes, which is affiliated with the NFLPA and the University of North Carolina, and is the medical director of Pop Warner Football, the nation’s largest youth football association.
Arthur L. Day, MD, graduated from Louisiana State University Medical School in 1972.
He completed his surgical internship iin Birmingham, Alabama, and subsequently completed his residency in neurological surgery and fellowship in brain tumor immunology at the University of Florida College of Medicine in Gainesville, Florida.
Day practiced at the University of Florida for 25 years, ultimately rising to the positions of professor, co-chair, and program director of the department of neurological surgery at the University of Florida. In 2002, he moved to Boston to assume a position as a professor of surgery at Harvard Medical School with a clinical practice at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. While there, he served as the associate chair and residency program director of the department of neurological surgery at Brigham and Women’s and Children’s Hospital in Boston. Subsequently, he was the chair of the department and also the director of the Cerebrovascular Center and the Neurologic Sports Injury Center at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. He co-founded and directed an annual meeting at Fenway Park addressing the latest knowledge and treatments of athletic-related neurological injuries. He currently is professor, vice chair, residency program director, and director of clinical education in the department of neurosurgery at the University of Texas Medical School at Houston.
Day has held leadership positions in many medical professional societies and has received numerous awards and honors. He has published almost 170 journal articles and book chapters and has co-edited a book about neurological sports injuries. He is an internationally recognized expert in neurological sports medicine. For the past 30 years, he has served as a consulting physician for multiple NCAA and National Football League (NFL) teams.
“…[T]he authors make detailed and potentially difficult study material easy to read and understand throughout.”
NATA News
Theories of negligence in sports-related injury cases
Many different theories of negligence have arisen over the years in litigation concerning injuries sustained during contact sports. These theories are limited only by the innovative thought processes of skilled attorneys.
Many different theories of negligence have arisen over the years in litigation concerning injuries sustained during contact sports. These theories are limited only by the innovative thought processes of skilled attorneys. Nonetheless, final judgment is always decided by our judiciary, which is charged with ensuring compliance with the law. Although the system is not perfect (none are), our civil justice system allows theories regulated by rules of procedure and evidence to be subjected to a judgment by our peers with constant judicial oversight. An additional safeguard is provided through appellate review.
The following negligence claims frequently appear in sports-related injury cases:
- Failure to properly train
- Failure to be properly credentialed
- Inadequate supervision45
- Failure to properly observe, refer, or stabilize the injured player
- Unequal matching of opponents (boxing)
- Improper return to play46, 47
- Improper equipment or fitting
- Improper screening or physicals
- Failure to warn of risks
- Failure to enact proper rules for concussions or return to play
- Failure to stop or curtail risky or violent conduct
- Medical malpractice48
- Negligent hiring or retention of personnel
- Improper design or maintenance of playing field or premises
- Failure to have an emergency medical plan49
- Improper medical clearance50
This list of claims is not meant to be all-inclusive, but rather sets forth various examples of claims that have been made in recent years. Irrespective of the type of claim, there must always be evidence sufficient to support a finding of each of the four elements of negligence, that is, duty, breach, causation, and damages.
Product liability cases stand alone in a separate category. These claims are typically filed against the manufacturer or distributor of the equipment, alleging that the product was defective in design or manufacture or that the manufacturer failed to warn of known dangers with the use of the product. Some product cases may also include an allegation that the product was unsafe for its intended purpose.51 An example of a products liability claim is Daniels v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, Inc. , 52 wherein a high school football player sustained permanent brain damage when his helmet "caved in" during a collision with another player. The injured player brought a products liability and negligence claim against the helmet manufacturer. The jury found that the helmet was defectively manufactured and that the manufacturer had a duty to warn that the helmet would not protect a player against head and brain injuries. A judgment was rendered against the manufacturer for $750,000 in compensatory damages and $750,000 in punitive damages.
Cases of Interest
It is impossible to predict all of the factual scenarios people will encounter that could subject them to potential liability arising from a sport-related contact or neurological injury. Examining prior legal cases and their results, however, can provide guidance as to what is and is not acceptable conduct when one is confronted with a sport-related injury. The doctrine of stare decisis requires courts of law "to follow earlier judicial decisions when the same points arise again in litigation."53, 54 Courts of law adhere to stare decisis because it provides continuity and predictability in our legal system and further provides notice to society as to what one's rights, duties, and obligations are.55, 56
As noted previously, the public has only recently begun to learn about the serious consequences of concussions and head trauma in contact sports. Because of this, there are limited published legal opinions addressing these issues as compared to other traditional areas of tort law. It can be expected that the law on this subject will continue to develop rapidly to keep pace with advancing research and science. The following cases are a sample of judicial opinions from across the country that demonstrate how courts have addressed various issues relating to neurological sports injuries. These cases are not intended to cover the full litany of factual patterns that may lead to allegations of liability, and they do not cover all the legal issues implicated in sport injuries. Rather, these cases have been selected to allow the reader to gain insight into how the law is applied to varying factual scenarios.
Harvey v. Ouchita Parish School Board
During his sophomore and junior years, Michael Harvey had established himself as a star player on the West Monroe High School football team in Ouachita Parish, Louisiana. Before the start of his senior year, he sustained two minor neck injuries during football.57 Harvey's father, a chiropractor, treated his son for these injuries and told Michael's coach that Michael had to wear a neck roll in all practices and games for an indefinite period of time to protect his neck from further injury.58
During the second game of his senior season, Michael's neck roll was torn off his shoulder pads and was damaged to the extent it could not be reattached. During halftime of the game, Michael inquired about an extra neck roll with the student trainer, who indicated that there were none. Michael did not ask any of the coaches for a neck roll and returned to play in the third quarter without a neck roll. After making an interception, Michael was tackled by the face mask during the return and sustained a ruptured disc at C4-5. Michael was treated with a discectomy and fusion.
Michael filed suit against his high school football coach and the school board as a result of the injuries he sustained. At trial, the court found the coach and staff negligent for failing to require a "player to wear available protective equipment to minimize the risk of a player being injured when tackled, even by actions that violate game rules, such as the ‘face mask' and ‘late hit' infractions for which penalty flags are thrown."59 The judgment totaled $215,000 including $35,000 for "loss of opportunity to play college football." The total judgment was reduced by 20% for Michael's portion of his comparative fault.60
Maldonado v. Gateway Hotel Holdings, L.L.C.
A 23-year-old professional boxer, Fernando Maldonado, was knocked out in a fight at the Gateway Hotel in St. Louis in 1999. After being revived, Maldonado walked to his dressing room, where he lost consciousness. There was no ambulance on-site or on standby, nor was medical monitoring provided. Maldonado alleged that the hotel, as the landowner, failed to have an ambulance and medical monitoring on-site, which delayed his treatment, thereby causing significant brain injury and numerous motor and cognitive deficits. The jury found the hotel negligent and awarded $13.7 million in compensatory damages. Although a request for punitive damages was not made, the jury, on its own, assessed punitive damages in the amount of $27.4 million to the verdict, which was later struck by the judge.61
Cerny v. Cedar Bluffs Junior/Senior Public School
In September 1995, Brent Cerny struck his head against the ground while attempting to make a tackle in a football game. Reports indicated that Cerny was dizzy and disoriented but remained in the game for a couple of plays before taking himself out. Cerny returned to the game in the third quarter and played to its conclusion. He participated in practice the following week and was injured again when his helmet struck another player during practice drills. Cerny's doctor testified that he suffered a closed head injury with second concussion syndrome.
In his lawsuit, Cerny advanced several theories of negligence against his coach, including failing to adequately examine, failing to obtain qualified medical attention, and improperly allowing him to return to play. Critical testimony during the trial was conflicting. The judge found that the coach's conduct in evaluating Cerny and permitting him to reenter the game and participate in subsequent practices was consistent with what a reasonable coach would do under like or similar circumstances. The judge's verdict found that the coach was not negligent.62
Pinson v. State of Tennessee
In 1984, Michael Pinson received a blow to his head in a football practice. Shortly afterward, he collapsed and remained unconscious for 10 minutes. The school's athletic trainer examined Pinson and found facial palsy; no control on the left side of the body; unequal pupils; and no response to pain, sound, or movement. Pinson was thereafter immediately rushed to the hospital. The team trainer did not accompany Pinson to the hospital and instead sent a student trainer. Hospital records revealed that the student trainer informed hospital personnel that Pinson had been unconscious for 2 minutes. The school's trainer later appeared at the hospital but never conveyed to hospital personnel the significant neurological findings he had made on the field. Pinson's subsequent symptoms of headache, known by the trainer, together with the trainer's original findings, were never relayed to Pinson's treating doctor, who ultimately allowed Pinson to return to play.
Three weeks after the concussion, Pinson was "kicked in the head" and collapsed unconscious at practice. Surgery revealed a chronic subdural hematoma that had been present likely for 3 to 4 weeks. Pinson remained in a coma for several weeks following his brain surgery and became hemiparetic.
At a commissioner's trial, the school's trainer was found negligent for failing to communicate Pinson's neurological signs and symptoms to the emergency room and treating physician. Damages of $300,000 were assessed against the school trainer and the school.63
Rosada v. State of New York
John Rosado, a state detainee, filed suit against the state as a result of a fractured skull he sustained when he fell while playing basketball at the detention center. Rosado alleged that the state was negligent for using concrete floors instead of hardwood. The court found that no duty existed to use wooden basketball floors, and judgment was entered against Rosado.64
Regan v. State of New York
In Regan v. State of New York, a young college rugby player suffered a broken neck while practicing as a member of the rugby club and was rendered quadriplegic. The player filed a lawsuit against the state university alleging inter alia, negligent supervision of the practice. The court dismissed the claim, finding that the player had assumed the risk of "those injury-causing events which are known, apparent, or reasonably foreseeable consequences of their own participation."65
Lessons to Be Learned
As demonstrated by the previously discussed cases, the application of the law is not a mechanical approach. The outcome of each case is dependent on its own unique facts. As such, there is no bright-line rule or specific course of conduct that the law prescribes to avoid liability completely. As in all negligence claims, in a claim against a medical provider or responsible person involving a sport-related injury, the defendant will be evaluated under the "reasonable person" standard. Thus, in order to avoid liability, she must act as a reasonable medical provider, trainer, coach, or other professional would under the same or similar circumstances.
Read more from Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes, and Arthur L. Day.
Neurological hand injuries in bowling
Bowling can be traced back more than 5,000 years ago to Egypt. In the 1930s, a British anthropologist named Sir Flinders Petrie discovered a collection of objects in a child’s tomb in Egypt that appeared to have been used for a primitive form of bowling.
Bowling can be traced back more than 5,000 years ago to Egypt. In the 1930s, a British anthropologist named Sir Flinders Petrie discovered a collection of objects in a child's tomb in Egypt that appeared to have been used for a primitive form of bowling. A crude version of a bowling ball and primitive pins were all sized for a child. A similar game evolved during the Roman Empire that entailed tossing stone objects as close as possible to other stone objects. This game became popular with soldiers and eventually evolved into Italian bocce (considered a form of outdoor bowling). The game has continued to evolve and today is a sport enjoyed by more than 100 million people in more than 90 countries each year and is considered a timeless sport.[ 97]
Although not typically thought of as a sport with a high risk of injury, bowling can be both physically and psychologically demanding. Tremendous force is applied to the body throughout a bowler's stance, approach, pivot step, arm swing, release, and follow-through. Repetitive stress is applied to the entire upper extremity including the fingers, wrist, and elbow. Injuries may vary by age as well. A recent study examined bowling-related injuries presenting to U.S. emergency departments between 1990 and 2008.[ 162] The authors analyzed data from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission's National Electronic Injury Surveillance System and found that children younger than 7 years had a higher proportion of finger injuries and injuries from dropping the ball than individuals older than 7 years. On the other hand, bowlers more than 65 years old sustained a greater proportion of injuries related to falling, slipping, or tripping.
While the annual incidence of injury is extremely low, the sport can cause a spectrum of neurologic hand and upper extremity injuries, either acute or due to overuse. Injuries to the fingers and digital nerves can occur. One report described a bowler with a rare traumatic dislocation of the four long fingers.[197] More commonly, though, the repetitive nature of bowling can lead to injuries to the digital nerve of the thumb, which most bowlers place inside the ball holes; this is referred to as "cherry pitter's thumb"[337] (figure 1.2). Perineural fibrosis of the digital nerve of the thumb[297, 351] and even cases of thumb neuromas have been described.[164, 165] Dobyns and colleagues reported on one of the largest series of these patients.[78] Patients may present with a positive Tinel's sign and skin atrophy or callusing over the neuroma. The nerve may ultimately become atrophied with fibrous tissue proliferation at the site of injury. Not to be forgotten, neck and back pain can also occur in bowling and is often the result of discogenic injury.[ 228]
http://www.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/129/E5835_467544_ebook_Main.jpg
http://www.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/129/E5835_467545_ebook_Main.jpg
Bowler's thumb. This patient was taken to surgery because he did not respond to conservative therapy after a clinical diagnosis of bowler's thumb. At surgery, the digital nerve was markedly enlarged secondary to perineural fibrosis. (a) The enlarged ulnar digital nerve (arrows) is surrounded by perineural fibrosis producing an irregular rather than a normal smooth contour. Definitive surgical therapy consisted of neurolysis with careful removal of perineural fibrotic tissue. (b) The nerve is smaller and has a smoother contour following neurolysis. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was able to eventually return to bowling.
Reprinted from M.F. Showalter, D.H. Flemming, and S.A. Bernard, 2010, "MRI manifestations of bowler's thumb," Radiology Case Reports 6: 458. By permission of D.H. Flemming.
Read more from Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes, and Arthur L. Day.
Injuries to the cervical nerve root and brachial plexus neurapraxia
Cervical nerve root and brachial plexus neurapraxia are known by several colloquialisms, such as "burners" or "stingers." Stretching of the upper trunk of the brachial plexus accounts for the majority of these syndromes.
Cervical nerve root and brachial plexus neurapraxia are known by several colloquialisms, such as "burners" or "stingers." Stretching of the upper trunk of the brachial plexus accounts for the majority of these syndromes. Downward traction of the shoulder associated with lateral flexion of the neck to the opposite side is the proposed mechanism of injury in many cases. A similar pattern can be seen with a direct injury to the plexus by an external force applied to the supraclavicular area. The neurologic deficit in almost all of these cases includes the upper portion of the plexus, with weakness of the deltoid, biceps, and shoulder rotator muscles, and numbness extending down to the thumb and index finger (figure 16.4).
http://www.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/129/E5835_467731_ebook_Main.jpg
Plexus or root injuries. (a) Schematic: brachial plexus. Note its origins from the C5 through T1 nerve roots. UT = upper trunk, formed by a merger of the anterior divisions of the C5 and C6 roots. (b) Mechanisms of plexus versus root injury: The superior position of the upper trunk makes it most vulnerable to direct blows or stretching from distraction of the neck away from the shoulder. In contrast, a root may also be injured by lateral flexion of the neck toward the side of symptoms, associated with foraminal narrowing, especially in the presence of an underlying disc herniation or osteophyte.
Any other pattern of radicular symptoms is more suggestive of an isolated nerve root injury. The C5 and C6 nerve roots are most commonly affected, due to transient neural foraminal narrowing from a compressive axial force. An underlying osteophyte or disc rupture is identified in many of these cases.
Read more from Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes, and Arthur L. Day.
Theories of negligence in sports-related injury cases
Many different theories of negligence have arisen over the years in litigation concerning injuries sustained during contact sports. These theories are limited only by the innovative thought processes of skilled attorneys.
Many different theories of negligence have arisen over the years in litigation concerning injuries sustained during contact sports. These theories are limited only by the innovative thought processes of skilled attorneys. Nonetheless, final judgment is always decided by our judiciary, which is charged with ensuring compliance with the law. Although the system is not perfect (none are), our civil justice system allows theories regulated by rules of procedure and evidence to be subjected to a judgment by our peers with constant judicial oversight. An additional safeguard is provided through appellate review.
The following negligence claims frequently appear in sports-related injury cases:
- Failure to properly train
- Failure to be properly credentialed
- Inadequate supervision45
- Failure to properly observe, refer, or stabilize the injured player
- Unequal matching of opponents (boxing)
- Improper return to play46, 47
- Improper equipment or fitting
- Improper screening or physicals
- Failure to warn of risks
- Failure to enact proper rules for concussions or return to play
- Failure to stop or curtail risky or violent conduct
- Medical malpractice48
- Negligent hiring or retention of personnel
- Improper design or maintenance of playing field or premises
- Failure to have an emergency medical plan49
- Improper medical clearance50
This list of claims is not meant to be all-inclusive, but rather sets forth various examples of claims that have been made in recent years. Irrespective of the type of claim, there must always be evidence sufficient to support a finding of each of the four elements of negligence, that is, duty, breach, causation, and damages.
Product liability cases stand alone in a separate category. These claims are typically filed against the manufacturer or distributor of the equipment, alleging that the product was defective in design or manufacture or that the manufacturer failed to warn of known dangers with the use of the product. Some product cases may also include an allegation that the product was unsafe for its intended purpose.51 An example of a products liability claim is Daniels v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, Inc. , 52 wherein a high school football player sustained permanent brain damage when his helmet "caved in" during a collision with another player. The injured player brought a products liability and negligence claim against the helmet manufacturer. The jury found that the helmet was defectively manufactured and that the manufacturer had a duty to warn that the helmet would not protect a player against head and brain injuries. A judgment was rendered against the manufacturer for $750,000 in compensatory damages and $750,000 in punitive damages.
Cases of Interest
It is impossible to predict all of the factual scenarios people will encounter that could subject them to potential liability arising from a sport-related contact or neurological injury. Examining prior legal cases and their results, however, can provide guidance as to what is and is not acceptable conduct when one is confronted with a sport-related injury. The doctrine of stare decisis requires courts of law "to follow earlier judicial decisions when the same points arise again in litigation."53, 54 Courts of law adhere to stare decisis because it provides continuity and predictability in our legal system and further provides notice to society as to what one's rights, duties, and obligations are.55, 56
As noted previously, the public has only recently begun to learn about the serious consequences of concussions and head trauma in contact sports. Because of this, there are limited published legal opinions addressing these issues as compared to other traditional areas of tort law. It can be expected that the law on this subject will continue to develop rapidly to keep pace with advancing research and science. The following cases are a sample of judicial opinions from across the country that demonstrate how courts have addressed various issues relating to neurological sports injuries. These cases are not intended to cover the full litany of factual patterns that may lead to allegations of liability, and they do not cover all the legal issues implicated in sport injuries. Rather, these cases have been selected to allow the reader to gain insight into how the law is applied to varying factual scenarios.
Harvey v. Ouchita Parish School Board
During his sophomore and junior years, Michael Harvey had established himself as a star player on the West Monroe High School football team in Ouachita Parish, Louisiana. Before the start of his senior year, he sustained two minor neck injuries during football.57 Harvey's father, a chiropractor, treated his son for these injuries and told Michael's coach that Michael had to wear a neck roll in all practices and games for an indefinite period of time to protect his neck from further injury.58
During the second game of his senior season, Michael's neck roll was torn off his shoulder pads and was damaged to the extent it could not be reattached. During halftime of the game, Michael inquired about an extra neck roll with the student trainer, who indicated that there were none. Michael did not ask any of the coaches for a neck roll and returned to play in the third quarter without a neck roll. After making an interception, Michael was tackled by the face mask during the return and sustained a ruptured disc at C4-5. Michael was treated with a discectomy and fusion.
Michael filed suit against his high school football coach and the school board as a result of the injuries he sustained. At trial, the court found the coach and staff negligent for failing to require a "player to wear available protective equipment to minimize the risk of a player being injured when tackled, even by actions that violate game rules, such as the ‘face mask' and ‘late hit' infractions for which penalty flags are thrown."59 The judgment totaled $215,000 including $35,000 for "loss of opportunity to play college football." The total judgment was reduced by 20% for Michael's portion of his comparative fault.60
Maldonado v. Gateway Hotel Holdings, L.L.C.
A 23-year-old professional boxer, Fernando Maldonado, was knocked out in a fight at the Gateway Hotel in St. Louis in 1999. After being revived, Maldonado walked to his dressing room, where he lost consciousness. There was no ambulance on-site or on standby, nor was medical monitoring provided. Maldonado alleged that the hotel, as the landowner, failed to have an ambulance and medical monitoring on-site, which delayed his treatment, thereby causing significant brain injury and numerous motor and cognitive deficits. The jury found the hotel negligent and awarded $13.7 million in compensatory damages. Although a request for punitive damages was not made, the jury, on its own, assessed punitive damages in the amount of $27.4 million to the verdict, which was later struck by the judge.61
Cerny v. Cedar Bluffs Junior/Senior Public School
In September 1995, Brent Cerny struck his head against the ground while attempting to make a tackle in a football game. Reports indicated that Cerny was dizzy and disoriented but remained in the game for a couple of plays before taking himself out. Cerny returned to the game in the third quarter and played to its conclusion. He participated in practice the following week and was injured again when his helmet struck another player during practice drills. Cerny's doctor testified that he suffered a closed head injury with second concussion syndrome.
In his lawsuit, Cerny advanced several theories of negligence against his coach, including failing to adequately examine, failing to obtain qualified medical attention, and improperly allowing him to return to play. Critical testimony during the trial was conflicting. The judge found that the coach's conduct in evaluating Cerny and permitting him to reenter the game and participate in subsequent practices was consistent with what a reasonable coach would do under like or similar circumstances. The judge's verdict found that the coach was not negligent.62
Pinson v. State of Tennessee
In 1984, Michael Pinson received a blow to his head in a football practice. Shortly afterward, he collapsed and remained unconscious for 10 minutes. The school's athletic trainer examined Pinson and found facial palsy; no control on the left side of the body; unequal pupils; and no response to pain, sound, or movement. Pinson was thereafter immediately rushed to the hospital. The team trainer did not accompany Pinson to the hospital and instead sent a student trainer. Hospital records revealed that the student trainer informed hospital personnel that Pinson had been unconscious for 2 minutes. The school's trainer later appeared at the hospital but never conveyed to hospital personnel the significant neurological findings he had made on the field. Pinson's subsequent symptoms of headache, known by the trainer, together with the trainer's original findings, were never relayed to Pinson's treating doctor, who ultimately allowed Pinson to return to play.
Three weeks after the concussion, Pinson was "kicked in the head" and collapsed unconscious at practice. Surgery revealed a chronic subdural hematoma that had been present likely for 3 to 4 weeks. Pinson remained in a coma for several weeks following his brain surgery and became hemiparetic.
At a commissioner's trial, the school's trainer was found negligent for failing to communicate Pinson's neurological signs and symptoms to the emergency room and treating physician. Damages of $300,000 were assessed against the school trainer and the school.63
Rosada v. State of New York
John Rosado, a state detainee, filed suit against the state as a result of a fractured skull he sustained when he fell while playing basketball at the detention center. Rosado alleged that the state was negligent for using concrete floors instead of hardwood. The court found that no duty existed to use wooden basketball floors, and judgment was entered against Rosado.64
Regan v. State of New York
In Regan v. State of New York, a young college rugby player suffered a broken neck while practicing as a member of the rugby club and was rendered quadriplegic. The player filed a lawsuit against the state university alleging inter alia, negligent supervision of the practice. The court dismissed the claim, finding that the player had assumed the risk of "those injury-causing events which are known, apparent, or reasonably foreseeable consequences of their own participation."65
Lessons to Be Learned
As demonstrated by the previously discussed cases, the application of the law is not a mechanical approach. The outcome of each case is dependent on its own unique facts. As such, there is no bright-line rule or specific course of conduct that the law prescribes to avoid liability completely. As in all negligence claims, in a claim against a medical provider or responsible person involving a sport-related injury, the defendant will be evaluated under the "reasonable person" standard. Thus, in order to avoid liability, she must act as a reasonable medical provider, trainer, coach, or other professional would under the same or similar circumstances.
Read more from Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes, and Arthur L. Day.
Neurological hand injuries in bowling
Bowling can be traced back more than 5,000 years ago to Egypt. In the 1930s, a British anthropologist named Sir Flinders Petrie discovered a collection of objects in a child’s tomb in Egypt that appeared to have been used for a primitive form of bowling.
Bowling can be traced back more than 5,000 years ago to Egypt. In the 1930s, a British anthropologist named Sir Flinders Petrie discovered a collection of objects in a child's tomb in Egypt that appeared to have been used for a primitive form of bowling. A crude version of a bowling ball and primitive pins were all sized for a child. A similar game evolved during the Roman Empire that entailed tossing stone objects as close as possible to other stone objects. This game became popular with soldiers and eventually evolved into Italian bocce (considered a form of outdoor bowling). The game has continued to evolve and today is a sport enjoyed by more than 100 million people in more than 90 countries each year and is considered a timeless sport.[ 97]
Although not typically thought of as a sport with a high risk of injury, bowling can be both physically and psychologically demanding. Tremendous force is applied to the body throughout a bowler's stance, approach, pivot step, arm swing, release, and follow-through. Repetitive stress is applied to the entire upper extremity including the fingers, wrist, and elbow. Injuries may vary by age as well. A recent study examined bowling-related injuries presenting to U.S. emergency departments between 1990 and 2008.[ 162] The authors analyzed data from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission's National Electronic Injury Surveillance System and found that children younger than 7 years had a higher proportion of finger injuries and injuries from dropping the ball than individuals older than 7 years. On the other hand, bowlers more than 65 years old sustained a greater proportion of injuries related to falling, slipping, or tripping.
While the annual incidence of injury is extremely low, the sport can cause a spectrum of neurologic hand and upper extremity injuries, either acute or due to overuse. Injuries to the fingers and digital nerves can occur. One report described a bowler with a rare traumatic dislocation of the four long fingers.[197] More commonly, though, the repetitive nature of bowling can lead to injuries to the digital nerve of the thumb, which most bowlers place inside the ball holes; this is referred to as "cherry pitter's thumb"[337] (figure 1.2). Perineural fibrosis of the digital nerve of the thumb[297, 351] and even cases of thumb neuromas have been described.[164, 165] Dobyns and colleagues reported on one of the largest series of these patients.[78] Patients may present with a positive Tinel's sign and skin atrophy or callusing over the neuroma. The nerve may ultimately become atrophied with fibrous tissue proliferation at the site of injury. Not to be forgotten, neck and back pain can also occur in bowling and is often the result of discogenic injury.[ 228]
http://www.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/129/E5835_467544_ebook_Main.jpg
http://www.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/129/E5835_467545_ebook_Main.jpg
Bowler's thumb. This patient was taken to surgery because he did not respond to conservative therapy after a clinical diagnosis of bowler's thumb. At surgery, the digital nerve was markedly enlarged secondary to perineural fibrosis. (a) The enlarged ulnar digital nerve (arrows) is surrounded by perineural fibrosis producing an irregular rather than a normal smooth contour. Definitive surgical therapy consisted of neurolysis with careful removal of perineural fibrotic tissue. (b) The nerve is smaller and has a smoother contour following neurolysis. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was able to eventually return to bowling.
Reprinted from M.F. Showalter, D.H. Flemming, and S.A. Bernard, 2010, "MRI manifestations of bowler's thumb," Radiology Case Reports 6: 458. By permission of D.H. Flemming.
Read more from Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes, and Arthur L. Day.
Injuries to the cervical nerve root and brachial plexus neurapraxia
Cervical nerve root and brachial plexus neurapraxia are known by several colloquialisms, such as "burners" or "stingers." Stretching of the upper trunk of the brachial plexus accounts for the majority of these syndromes.
Cervical nerve root and brachial plexus neurapraxia are known by several colloquialisms, such as "burners" or "stingers." Stretching of the upper trunk of the brachial plexus accounts for the majority of these syndromes. Downward traction of the shoulder associated with lateral flexion of the neck to the opposite side is the proposed mechanism of injury in many cases. A similar pattern can be seen with a direct injury to the plexus by an external force applied to the supraclavicular area. The neurologic deficit in almost all of these cases includes the upper portion of the plexus, with weakness of the deltoid, biceps, and shoulder rotator muscles, and numbness extending down to the thumb and index finger (figure 16.4).
http://www.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/129/E5835_467731_ebook_Main.jpg
Plexus or root injuries. (a) Schematic: brachial plexus. Note its origins from the C5 through T1 nerve roots. UT = upper trunk, formed by a merger of the anterior divisions of the C5 and C6 roots. (b) Mechanisms of plexus versus root injury: The superior position of the upper trunk makes it most vulnerable to direct blows or stretching from distraction of the neck away from the shoulder. In contrast, a root may also be injured by lateral flexion of the neck toward the side of symptoms, associated with foraminal narrowing, especially in the presence of an underlying disc herniation or osteophyte.
Any other pattern of radicular symptoms is more suggestive of an isolated nerve root injury. The C5 and C6 nerve roots are most commonly affected, due to transient neural foraminal narrowing from a compressive axial force. An underlying osteophyte or disc rupture is identified in many of these cases.
Read more from Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes, and Arthur L. Day.
Theories of negligence in sports-related injury cases
Many different theories of negligence have arisen over the years in litigation concerning injuries sustained during contact sports. These theories are limited only by the innovative thought processes of skilled attorneys.
Many different theories of negligence have arisen over the years in litigation concerning injuries sustained during contact sports. These theories are limited only by the innovative thought processes of skilled attorneys. Nonetheless, final judgment is always decided by our judiciary, which is charged with ensuring compliance with the law. Although the system is not perfect (none are), our civil justice system allows theories regulated by rules of procedure and evidence to be subjected to a judgment by our peers with constant judicial oversight. An additional safeguard is provided through appellate review.
The following negligence claims frequently appear in sports-related injury cases:
- Failure to properly train
- Failure to be properly credentialed
- Inadequate supervision45
- Failure to properly observe, refer, or stabilize the injured player
- Unequal matching of opponents (boxing)
- Improper return to play46, 47
- Improper equipment or fitting
- Improper screening or physicals
- Failure to warn of risks
- Failure to enact proper rules for concussions or return to play
- Failure to stop or curtail risky or violent conduct
- Medical malpractice48
- Negligent hiring or retention of personnel
- Improper design or maintenance of playing field or premises
- Failure to have an emergency medical plan49
- Improper medical clearance50
This list of claims is not meant to be all-inclusive, but rather sets forth various examples of claims that have been made in recent years. Irrespective of the type of claim, there must always be evidence sufficient to support a finding of each of the four elements of negligence, that is, duty, breach, causation, and damages.
Product liability cases stand alone in a separate category. These claims are typically filed against the manufacturer or distributor of the equipment, alleging that the product was defective in design or manufacture or that the manufacturer failed to warn of known dangers with the use of the product. Some product cases may also include an allegation that the product was unsafe for its intended purpose.51 An example of a products liability claim is Daniels v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, Inc. , 52 wherein a high school football player sustained permanent brain damage when his helmet "caved in" during a collision with another player. The injured player brought a products liability and negligence claim against the helmet manufacturer. The jury found that the helmet was defectively manufactured and that the manufacturer had a duty to warn that the helmet would not protect a player against head and brain injuries. A judgment was rendered against the manufacturer for $750,000 in compensatory damages and $750,000 in punitive damages.
Cases of Interest
It is impossible to predict all of the factual scenarios people will encounter that could subject them to potential liability arising from a sport-related contact or neurological injury. Examining prior legal cases and their results, however, can provide guidance as to what is and is not acceptable conduct when one is confronted with a sport-related injury. The doctrine of stare decisis requires courts of law "to follow earlier judicial decisions when the same points arise again in litigation."53, 54 Courts of law adhere to stare decisis because it provides continuity and predictability in our legal system and further provides notice to society as to what one's rights, duties, and obligations are.55, 56
As noted previously, the public has only recently begun to learn about the serious consequences of concussions and head trauma in contact sports. Because of this, there are limited published legal opinions addressing these issues as compared to other traditional areas of tort law. It can be expected that the law on this subject will continue to develop rapidly to keep pace with advancing research and science. The following cases are a sample of judicial opinions from across the country that demonstrate how courts have addressed various issues relating to neurological sports injuries. These cases are not intended to cover the full litany of factual patterns that may lead to allegations of liability, and they do not cover all the legal issues implicated in sport injuries. Rather, these cases have been selected to allow the reader to gain insight into how the law is applied to varying factual scenarios.
Harvey v. Ouchita Parish School Board
During his sophomore and junior years, Michael Harvey had established himself as a star player on the West Monroe High School football team in Ouachita Parish, Louisiana. Before the start of his senior year, he sustained two minor neck injuries during football.57 Harvey's father, a chiropractor, treated his son for these injuries and told Michael's coach that Michael had to wear a neck roll in all practices and games for an indefinite period of time to protect his neck from further injury.58
During the second game of his senior season, Michael's neck roll was torn off his shoulder pads and was damaged to the extent it could not be reattached. During halftime of the game, Michael inquired about an extra neck roll with the student trainer, who indicated that there were none. Michael did not ask any of the coaches for a neck roll and returned to play in the third quarter without a neck roll. After making an interception, Michael was tackled by the face mask during the return and sustained a ruptured disc at C4-5. Michael was treated with a discectomy and fusion.
Michael filed suit against his high school football coach and the school board as a result of the injuries he sustained. At trial, the court found the coach and staff negligent for failing to require a "player to wear available protective equipment to minimize the risk of a player being injured when tackled, even by actions that violate game rules, such as the ‘face mask' and ‘late hit' infractions for which penalty flags are thrown."59 The judgment totaled $215,000 including $35,000 for "loss of opportunity to play college football." The total judgment was reduced by 20% for Michael's portion of his comparative fault.60
Maldonado v. Gateway Hotel Holdings, L.L.C.
A 23-year-old professional boxer, Fernando Maldonado, was knocked out in a fight at the Gateway Hotel in St. Louis in 1999. After being revived, Maldonado walked to his dressing room, where he lost consciousness. There was no ambulance on-site or on standby, nor was medical monitoring provided. Maldonado alleged that the hotel, as the landowner, failed to have an ambulance and medical monitoring on-site, which delayed his treatment, thereby causing significant brain injury and numerous motor and cognitive deficits. The jury found the hotel negligent and awarded $13.7 million in compensatory damages. Although a request for punitive damages was not made, the jury, on its own, assessed punitive damages in the amount of $27.4 million to the verdict, which was later struck by the judge.61
Cerny v. Cedar Bluffs Junior/Senior Public School
In September 1995, Brent Cerny struck his head against the ground while attempting to make a tackle in a football game. Reports indicated that Cerny was dizzy and disoriented but remained in the game for a couple of plays before taking himself out. Cerny returned to the game in the third quarter and played to its conclusion. He participated in practice the following week and was injured again when his helmet struck another player during practice drills. Cerny's doctor testified that he suffered a closed head injury with second concussion syndrome.
In his lawsuit, Cerny advanced several theories of negligence against his coach, including failing to adequately examine, failing to obtain qualified medical attention, and improperly allowing him to return to play. Critical testimony during the trial was conflicting. The judge found that the coach's conduct in evaluating Cerny and permitting him to reenter the game and participate in subsequent practices was consistent with what a reasonable coach would do under like or similar circumstances. The judge's verdict found that the coach was not negligent.62
Pinson v. State of Tennessee
In 1984, Michael Pinson received a blow to his head in a football practice. Shortly afterward, he collapsed and remained unconscious for 10 minutes. The school's athletic trainer examined Pinson and found facial palsy; no control on the left side of the body; unequal pupils; and no response to pain, sound, or movement. Pinson was thereafter immediately rushed to the hospital. The team trainer did not accompany Pinson to the hospital and instead sent a student trainer. Hospital records revealed that the student trainer informed hospital personnel that Pinson had been unconscious for 2 minutes. The school's trainer later appeared at the hospital but never conveyed to hospital personnel the significant neurological findings he had made on the field. Pinson's subsequent symptoms of headache, known by the trainer, together with the trainer's original findings, were never relayed to Pinson's treating doctor, who ultimately allowed Pinson to return to play.
Three weeks after the concussion, Pinson was "kicked in the head" and collapsed unconscious at practice. Surgery revealed a chronic subdural hematoma that had been present likely for 3 to 4 weeks. Pinson remained in a coma for several weeks following his brain surgery and became hemiparetic.
At a commissioner's trial, the school's trainer was found negligent for failing to communicate Pinson's neurological signs and symptoms to the emergency room and treating physician. Damages of $300,000 were assessed against the school trainer and the school.63
Rosada v. State of New York
John Rosado, a state detainee, filed suit against the state as a result of a fractured skull he sustained when he fell while playing basketball at the detention center. Rosado alleged that the state was negligent for using concrete floors instead of hardwood. The court found that no duty existed to use wooden basketball floors, and judgment was entered against Rosado.64
Regan v. State of New York
In Regan v. State of New York, a young college rugby player suffered a broken neck while practicing as a member of the rugby club and was rendered quadriplegic. The player filed a lawsuit against the state university alleging inter alia, negligent supervision of the practice. The court dismissed the claim, finding that the player had assumed the risk of "those injury-causing events which are known, apparent, or reasonably foreseeable consequences of their own participation."65
Lessons to Be Learned
As demonstrated by the previously discussed cases, the application of the law is not a mechanical approach. The outcome of each case is dependent on its own unique facts. As such, there is no bright-line rule or specific course of conduct that the law prescribes to avoid liability completely. As in all negligence claims, in a claim against a medical provider or responsible person involving a sport-related injury, the defendant will be evaluated under the "reasonable person" standard. Thus, in order to avoid liability, she must act as a reasonable medical provider, trainer, coach, or other professional would under the same or similar circumstances.
Read more from Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes, and Arthur L. Day.
Neurological hand injuries in bowling
Bowling can be traced back more than 5,000 years ago to Egypt. In the 1930s, a British anthropologist named Sir Flinders Petrie discovered a collection of objects in a child’s tomb in Egypt that appeared to have been used for a primitive form of bowling.
Bowling can be traced back more than 5,000 years ago to Egypt. In the 1930s, a British anthropologist named Sir Flinders Petrie discovered a collection of objects in a child's tomb in Egypt that appeared to have been used for a primitive form of bowling. A crude version of a bowling ball and primitive pins were all sized for a child. A similar game evolved during the Roman Empire that entailed tossing stone objects as close as possible to other stone objects. This game became popular with soldiers and eventually evolved into Italian bocce (considered a form of outdoor bowling). The game has continued to evolve and today is a sport enjoyed by more than 100 million people in more than 90 countries each year and is considered a timeless sport.[ 97]
Although not typically thought of as a sport with a high risk of injury, bowling can be both physically and psychologically demanding. Tremendous force is applied to the body throughout a bowler's stance, approach, pivot step, arm swing, release, and follow-through. Repetitive stress is applied to the entire upper extremity including the fingers, wrist, and elbow. Injuries may vary by age as well. A recent study examined bowling-related injuries presenting to U.S. emergency departments between 1990 and 2008.[ 162] The authors analyzed data from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission's National Electronic Injury Surveillance System and found that children younger than 7 years had a higher proportion of finger injuries and injuries from dropping the ball than individuals older than 7 years. On the other hand, bowlers more than 65 years old sustained a greater proportion of injuries related to falling, slipping, or tripping.
While the annual incidence of injury is extremely low, the sport can cause a spectrum of neurologic hand and upper extremity injuries, either acute or due to overuse. Injuries to the fingers and digital nerves can occur. One report described a bowler with a rare traumatic dislocation of the four long fingers.[197] More commonly, though, the repetitive nature of bowling can lead to injuries to the digital nerve of the thumb, which most bowlers place inside the ball holes; this is referred to as "cherry pitter's thumb"[337] (figure 1.2). Perineural fibrosis of the digital nerve of the thumb[297, 351] and even cases of thumb neuromas have been described.[164, 165] Dobyns and colleagues reported on one of the largest series of these patients.[78] Patients may present with a positive Tinel's sign and skin atrophy or callusing over the neuroma. The nerve may ultimately become atrophied with fibrous tissue proliferation at the site of injury. Not to be forgotten, neck and back pain can also occur in bowling and is often the result of discogenic injury.[ 228]
http://www.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/129/E5835_467544_ebook_Main.jpg
http://www.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/129/E5835_467545_ebook_Main.jpg
Bowler's thumb. This patient was taken to surgery because he did not respond to conservative therapy after a clinical diagnosis of bowler's thumb. At surgery, the digital nerve was markedly enlarged secondary to perineural fibrosis. (a) The enlarged ulnar digital nerve (arrows) is surrounded by perineural fibrosis producing an irregular rather than a normal smooth contour. Definitive surgical therapy consisted of neurolysis with careful removal of perineural fibrotic tissue. (b) The nerve is smaller and has a smoother contour following neurolysis. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was able to eventually return to bowling.
Reprinted from M.F. Showalter, D.H. Flemming, and S.A. Bernard, 2010, "MRI manifestations of bowler's thumb," Radiology Case Reports 6: 458. By permission of D.H. Flemming.
Read more from Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes, and Arthur L. Day.
Injuries to the cervical nerve root and brachial plexus neurapraxia
Cervical nerve root and brachial plexus neurapraxia are known by several colloquialisms, such as "burners" or "stingers." Stretching of the upper trunk of the brachial plexus accounts for the majority of these syndromes.
Cervical nerve root and brachial plexus neurapraxia are known by several colloquialisms, such as "burners" or "stingers." Stretching of the upper trunk of the brachial plexus accounts for the majority of these syndromes. Downward traction of the shoulder associated with lateral flexion of the neck to the opposite side is the proposed mechanism of injury in many cases. A similar pattern can be seen with a direct injury to the plexus by an external force applied to the supraclavicular area. The neurologic deficit in almost all of these cases includes the upper portion of the plexus, with weakness of the deltoid, biceps, and shoulder rotator muscles, and numbness extending down to the thumb and index finger (figure 16.4).
http://www.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/129/E5835_467731_ebook_Main.jpg
Plexus or root injuries. (a) Schematic: brachial plexus. Note its origins from the C5 through T1 nerve roots. UT = upper trunk, formed by a merger of the anterior divisions of the C5 and C6 roots. (b) Mechanisms of plexus versus root injury: The superior position of the upper trunk makes it most vulnerable to direct blows or stretching from distraction of the neck away from the shoulder. In contrast, a root may also be injured by lateral flexion of the neck toward the side of symptoms, associated with foraminal narrowing, especially in the presence of an underlying disc herniation or osteophyte.
Any other pattern of radicular symptoms is more suggestive of an isolated nerve root injury. The C5 and C6 nerve roots are most commonly affected, due to transient neural foraminal narrowing from a compressive axial force. An underlying osteophyte or disc rupture is identified in many of these cases.
Read more from Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes, and Arthur L. Day.
Theories of negligence in sports-related injury cases
Many different theories of negligence have arisen over the years in litigation concerning injuries sustained during contact sports. These theories are limited only by the innovative thought processes of skilled attorneys.
Many different theories of negligence have arisen over the years in litigation concerning injuries sustained during contact sports. These theories are limited only by the innovative thought processes of skilled attorneys. Nonetheless, final judgment is always decided by our judiciary, which is charged with ensuring compliance with the law. Although the system is not perfect (none are), our civil justice system allows theories regulated by rules of procedure and evidence to be subjected to a judgment by our peers with constant judicial oversight. An additional safeguard is provided through appellate review.
The following negligence claims frequently appear in sports-related injury cases:
- Failure to properly train
- Failure to be properly credentialed
- Inadequate supervision45
- Failure to properly observe, refer, or stabilize the injured player
- Unequal matching of opponents (boxing)
- Improper return to play46, 47
- Improper equipment or fitting
- Improper screening or physicals
- Failure to warn of risks
- Failure to enact proper rules for concussions or return to play
- Failure to stop or curtail risky or violent conduct
- Medical malpractice48
- Negligent hiring or retention of personnel
- Improper design or maintenance of playing field or premises
- Failure to have an emergency medical plan49
- Improper medical clearance50
This list of claims is not meant to be all-inclusive, but rather sets forth various examples of claims that have been made in recent years. Irrespective of the type of claim, there must always be evidence sufficient to support a finding of each of the four elements of negligence, that is, duty, breach, causation, and damages.
Product liability cases stand alone in a separate category. These claims are typically filed against the manufacturer or distributor of the equipment, alleging that the product was defective in design or manufacture or that the manufacturer failed to warn of known dangers with the use of the product. Some product cases may also include an allegation that the product was unsafe for its intended purpose.51 An example of a products liability claim is Daniels v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, Inc. , 52 wherein a high school football player sustained permanent brain damage when his helmet "caved in" during a collision with another player. The injured player brought a products liability and negligence claim against the helmet manufacturer. The jury found that the helmet was defectively manufactured and that the manufacturer had a duty to warn that the helmet would not protect a player against head and brain injuries. A judgment was rendered against the manufacturer for $750,000 in compensatory damages and $750,000 in punitive damages.
Cases of Interest
It is impossible to predict all of the factual scenarios people will encounter that could subject them to potential liability arising from a sport-related contact or neurological injury. Examining prior legal cases and their results, however, can provide guidance as to what is and is not acceptable conduct when one is confronted with a sport-related injury. The doctrine of stare decisis requires courts of law "to follow earlier judicial decisions when the same points arise again in litigation."53, 54 Courts of law adhere to stare decisis because it provides continuity and predictability in our legal system and further provides notice to society as to what one's rights, duties, and obligations are.55, 56
As noted previously, the public has only recently begun to learn about the serious consequences of concussions and head trauma in contact sports. Because of this, there are limited published legal opinions addressing these issues as compared to other traditional areas of tort law. It can be expected that the law on this subject will continue to develop rapidly to keep pace with advancing research and science. The following cases are a sample of judicial opinions from across the country that demonstrate how courts have addressed various issues relating to neurological sports injuries. These cases are not intended to cover the full litany of factual patterns that may lead to allegations of liability, and they do not cover all the legal issues implicated in sport injuries. Rather, these cases have been selected to allow the reader to gain insight into how the law is applied to varying factual scenarios.
Harvey v. Ouchita Parish School Board
During his sophomore and junior years, Michael Harvey had established himself as a star player on the West Monroe High School football team in Ouachita Parish, Louisiana. Before the start of his senior year, he sustained two minor neck injuries during football.57 Harvey's father, a chiropractor, treated his son for these injuries and told Michael's coach that Michael had to wear a neck roll in all practices and games for an indefinite period of time to protect his neck from further injury.58
During the second game of his senior season, Michael's neck roll was torn off his shoulder pads and was damaged to the extent it could not be reattached. During halftime of the game, Michael inquired about an extra neck roll with the student trainer, who indicated that there were none. Michael did not ask any of the coaches for a neck roll and returned to play in the third quarter without a neck roll. After making an interception, Michael was tackled by the face mask during the return and sustained a ruptured disc at C4-5. Michael was treated with a discectomy and fusion.
Michael filed suit against his high school football coach and the school board as a result of the injuries he sustained. At trial, the court found the coach and staff negligent for failing to require a "player to wear available protective equipment to minimize the risk of a player being injured when tackled, even by actions that violate game rules, such as the ‘face mask' and ‘late hit' infractions for which penalty flags are thrown."59 The judgment totaled $215,000 including $35,000 for "loss of opportunity to play college football." The total judgment was reduced by 20% for Michael's portion of his comparative fault.60
Maldonado v. Gateway Hotel Holdings, L.L.C.
A 23-year-old professional boxer, Fernando Maldonado, was knocked out in a fight at the Gateway Hotel in St. Louis in 1999. After being revived, Maldonado walked to his dressing room, where he lost consciousness. There was no ambulance on-site or on standby, nor was medical monitoring provided. Maldonado alleged that the hotel, as the landowner, failed to have an ambulance and medical monitoring on-site, which delayed his treatment, thereby causing significant brain injury and numerous motor and cognitive deficits. The jury found the hotel negligent and awarded $13.7 million in compensatory damages. Although a request for punitive damages was not made, the jury, on its own, assessed punitive damages in the amount of $27.4 million to the verdict, which was later struck by the judge.61
Cerny v. Cedar Bluffs Junior/Senior Public School
In September 1995, Brent Cerny struck his head against the ground while attempting to make a tackle in a football game. Reports indicated that Cerny was dizzy and disoriented but remained in the game for a couple of plays before taking himself out. Cerny returned to the game in the third quarter and played to its conclusion. He participated in practice the following week and was injured again when his helmet struck another player during practice drills. Cerny's doctor testified that he suffered a closed head injury with second concussion syndrome.
In his lawsuit, Cerny advanced several theories of negligence against his coach, including failing to adequately examine, failing to obtain qualified medical attention, and improperly allowing him to return to play. Critical testimony during the trial was conflicting. The judge found that the coach's conduct in evaluating Cerny and permitting him to reenter the game and participate in subsequent practices was consistent with what a reasonable coach would do under like or similar circumstances. The judge's verdict found that the coach was not negligent.62
Pinson v. State of Tennessee
In 1984, Michael Pinson received a blow to his head in a football practice. Shortly afterward, he collapsed and remained unconscious for 10 minutes. The school's athletic trainer examined Pinson and found facial palsy; no control on the left side of the body; unequal pupils; and no response to pain, sound, or movement. Pinson was thereafter immediately rushed to the hospital. The team trainer did not accompany Pinson to the hospital and instead sent a student trainer. Hospital records revealed that the student trainer informed hospital personnel that Pinson had been unconscious for 2 minutes. The school's trainer later appeared at the hospital but never conveyed to hospital personnel the significant neurological findings he had made on the field. Pinson's subsequent symptoms of headache, known by the trainer, together with the trainer's original findings, were never relayed to Pinson's treating doctor, who ultimately allowed Pinson to return to play.
Three weeks after the concussion, Pinson was "kicked in the head" and collapsed unconscious at practice. Surgery revealed a chronic subdural hematoma that had been present likely for 3 to 4 weeks. Pinson remained in a coma for several weeks following his brain surgery and became hemiparetic.
At a commissioner's trial, the school's trainer was found negligent for failing to communicate Pinson's neurological signs and symptoms to the emergency room and treating physician. Damages of $300,000 were assessed against the school trainer and the school.63
Rosada v. State of New York
John Rosado, a state detainee, filed suit against the state as a result of a fractured skull he sustained when he fell while playing basketball at the detention center. Rosado alleged that the state was negligent for using concrete floors instead of hardwood. The court found that no duty existed to use wooden basketball floors, and judgment was entered against Rosado.64
Regan v. State of New York
In Regan v. State of New York, a young college rugby player suffered a broken neck while practicing as a member of the rugby club and was rendered quadriplegic. The player filed a lawsuit against the state university alleging inter alia, negligent supervision of the practice. The court dismissed the claim, finding that the player had assumed the risk of "those injury-causing events which are known, apparent, or reasonably foreseeable consequences of their own participation."65
Lessons to Be Learned
As demonstrated by the previously discussed cases, the application of the law is not a mechanical approach. The outcome of each case is dependent on its own unique facts. As such, there is no bright-line rule or specific course of conduct that the law prescribes to avoid liability completely. As in all negligence claims, in a claim against a medical provider or responsible person involving a sport-related injury, the defendant will be evaluated under the "reasonable person" standard. Thus, in order to avoid liability, she must act as a reasonable medical provider, trainer, coach, or other professional would under the same or similar circumstances.
Read more from Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes, and Arthur L. Day.
Neurological hand injuries in bowling
Bowling can be traced back more than 5,000 years ago to Egypt. In the 1930s, a British anthropologist named Sir Flinders Petrie discovered a collection of objects in a child’s tomb in Egypt that appeared to have been used for a primitive form of bowling.
Bowling can be traced back more than 5,000 years ago to Egypt. In the 1930s, a British anthropologist named Sir Flinders Petrie discovered a collection of objects in a child's tomb in Egypt that appeared to have been used for a primitive form of bowling. A crude version of a bowling ball and primitive pins were all sized for a child. A similar game evolved during the Roman Empire that entailed tossing stone objects as close as possible to other stone objects. This game became popular with soldiers and eventually evolved into Italian bocce (considered a form of outdoor bowling). The game has continued to evolve and today is a sport enjoyed by more than 100 million people in more than 90 countries each year and is considered a timeless sport.[ 97]
Although not typically thought of as a sport with a high risk of injury, bowling can be both physically and psychologically demanding. Tremendous force is applied to the body throughout a bowler's stance, approach, pivot step, arm swing, release, and follow-through. Repetitive stress is applied to the entire upper extremity including the fingers, wrist, and elbow. Injuries may vary by age as well. A recent study examined bowling-related injuries presenting to U.S. emergency departments between 1990 and 2008.[ 162] The authors analyzed data from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission's National Electronic Injury Surveillance System and found that children younger than 7 years had a higher proportion of finger injuries and injuries from dropping the ball than individuals older than 7 years. On the other hand, bowlers more than 65 years old sustained a greater proportion of injuries related to falling, slipping, or tripping.
While the annual incidence of injury is extremely low, the sport can cause a spectrum of neurologic hand and upper extremity injuries, either acute or due to overuse. Injuries to the fingers and digital nerves can occur. One report described a bowler with a rare traumatic dislocation of the four long fingers.[197] More commonly, though, the repetitive nature of bowling can lead to injuries to the digital nerve of the thumb, which most bowlers place inside the ball holes; this is referred to as "cherry pitter's thumb"[337] (figure 1.2). Perineural fibrosis of the digital nerve of the thumb[297, 351] and even cases of thumb neuromas have been described.[164, 165] Dobyns and colleagues reported on one of the largest series of these patients.[78] Patients may present with a positive Tinel's sign and skin atrophy or callusing over the neuroma. The nerve may ultimately become atrophied with fibrous tissue proliferation at the site of injury. Not to be forgotten, neck and back pain can also occur in bowling and is often the result of discogenic injury.[ 228]
http://www.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/129/E5835_467544_ebook_Main.jpg
http://www.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/129/E5835_467545_ebook_Main.jpg
Bowler's thumb. This patient was taken to surgery because he did not respond to conservative therapy after a clinical diagnosis of bowler's thumb. At surgery, the digital nerve was markedly enlarged secondary to perineural fibrosis. (a) The enlarged ulnar digital nerve (arrows) is surrounded by perineural fibrosis producing an irregular rather than a normal smooth contour. Definitive surgical therapy consisted of neurolysis with careful removal of perineural fibrotic tissue. (b) The nerve is smaller and has a smoother contour following neurolysis. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was able to eventually return to bowling.
Reprinted from M.F. Showalter, D.H. Flemming, and S.A. Bernard, 2010, "MRI manifestations of bowler's thumb," Radiology Case Reports 6: 458. By permission of D.H. Flemming.
Read more from Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes, and Arthur L. Day.
Injuries to the cervical nerve root and brachial plexus neurapraxia
Cervical nerve root and brachial plexus neurapraxia are known by several colloquialisms, such as "burners" or "stingers." Stretching of the upper trunk of the brachial plexus accounts for the majority of these syndromes.
Cervical nerve root and brachial plexus neurapraxia are known by several colloquialisms, such as "burners" or "stingers." Stretching of the upper trunk of the brachial plexus accounts for the majority of these syndromes. Downward traction of the shoulder associated with lateral flexion of the neck to the opposite side is the proposed mechanism of injury in many cases. A similar pattern can be seen with a direct injury to the plexus by an external force applied to the supraclavicular area. The neurologic deficit in almost all of these cases includes the upper portion of the plexus, with weakness of the deltoid, biceps, and shoulder rotator muscles, and numbness extending down to the thumb and index finger (figure 16.4).
http://www.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/129/E5835_467731_ebook_Main.jpg
Plexus or root injuries. (a) Schematic: brachial plexus. Note its origins from the C5 through T1 nerve roots. UT = upper trunk, formed by a merger of the anterior divisions of the C5 and C6 roots. (b) Mechanisms of plexus versus root injury: The superior position of the upper trunk makes it most vulnerable to direct blows or stretching from distraction of the neck away from the shoulder. In contrast, a root may also be injured by lateral flexion of the neck toward the side of symptoms, associated with foraminal narrowing, especially in the presence of an underlying disc herniation or osteophyte.
Any other pattern of radicular symptoms is more suggestive of an isolated nerve root injury. The C5 and C6 nerve roots are most commonly affected, due to transient neural foraminal narrowing from a compressive axial force. An underlying osteophyte or disc rupture is identified in many of these cases.
Read more from Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes, and Arthur L. Day.
Theories of negligence in sports-related injury cases
Many different theories of negligence have arisen over the years in litigation concerning injuries sustained during contact sports. These theories are limited only by the innovative thought processes of skilled attorneys.
Many different theories of negligence have arisen over the years in litigation concerning injuries sustained during contact sports. These theories are limited only by the innovative thought processes of skilled attorneys. Nonetheless, final judgment is always decided by our judiciary, which is charged with ensuring compliance with the law. Although the system is not perfect (none are), our civil justice system allows theories regulated by rules of procedure and evidence to be subjected to a judgment by our peers with constant judicial oversight. An additional safeguard is provided through appellate review.
The following negligence claims frequently appear in sports-related injury cases:
- Failure to properly train
- Failure to be properly credentialed
- Inadequate supervision45
- Failure to properly observe, refer, or stabilize the injured player
- Unequal matching of opponents (boxing)
- Improper return to play46, 47
- Improper equipment or fitting
- Improper screening or physicals
- Failure to warn of risks
- Failure to enact proper rules for concussions or return to play
- Failure to stop or curtail risky or violent conduct
- Medical malpractice48
- Negligent hiring or retention of personnel
- Improper design or maintenance of playing field or premises
- Failure to have an emergency medical plan49
- Improper medical clearance50
This list of claims is not meant to be all-inclusive, but rather sets forth various examples of claims that have been made in recent years. Irrespective of the type of claim, there must always be evidence sufficient to support a finding of each of the four elements of negligence, that is, duty, breach, causation, and damages.
Product liability cases stand alone in a separate category. These claims are typically filed against the manufacturer or distributor of the equipment, alleging that the product was defective in design or manufacture or that the manufacturer failed to warn of known dangers with the use of the product. Some product cases may also include an allegation that the product was unsafe for its intended purpose.51 An example of a products liability claim is Daniels v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, Inc. , 52 wherein a high school football player sustained permanent brain damage when his helmet "caved in" during a collision with another player. The injured player brought a products liability and negligence claim against the helmet manufacturer. The jury found that the helmet was defectively manufactured and that the manufacturer had a duty to warn that the helmet would not protect a player against head and brain injuries. A judgment was rendered against the manufacturer for $750,000 in compensatory damages and $750,000 in punitive damages.
Cases of Interest
It is impossible to predict all of the factual scenarios people will encounter that could subject them to potential liability arising from a sport-related contact or neurological injury. Examining prior legal cases and their results, however, can provide guidance as to what is and is not acceptable conduct when one is confronted with a sport-related injury. The doctrine of stare decisis requires courts of law "to follow earlier judicial decisions when the same points arise again in litigation."53, 54 Courts of law adhere to stare decisis because it provides continuity and predictability in our legal system and further provides notice to society as to what one's rights, duties, and obligations are.55, 56
As noted previously, the public has only recently begun to learn about the serious consequences of concussions and head trauma in contact sports. Because of this, there are limited published legal opinions addressing these issues as compared to other traditional areas of tort law. It can be expected that the law on this subject will continue to develop rapidly to keep pace with advancing research and science. The following cases are a sample of judicial opinions from across the country that demonstrate how courts have addressed various issues relating to neurological sports injuries. These cases are not intended to cover the full litany of factual patterns that may lead to allegations of liability, and they do not cover all the legal issues implicated in sport injuries. Rather, these cases have been selected to allow the reader to gain insight into how the law is applied to varying factual scenarios.
Harvey v. Ouchita Parish School Board
During his sophomore and junior years, Michael Harvey had established himself as a star player on the West Monroe High School football team in Ouachita Parish, Louisiana. Before the start of his senior year, he sustained two minor neck injuries during football.57 Harvey's father, a chiropractor, treated his son for these injuries and told Michael's coach that Michael had to wear a neck roll in all practices and games for an indefinite period of time to protect his neck from further injury.58
During the second game of his senior season, Michael's neck roll was torn off his shoulder pads and was damaged to the extent it could not be reattached. During halftime of the game, Michael inquired about an extra neck roll with the student trainer, who indicated that there were none. Michael did not ask any of the coaches for a neck roll and returned to play in the third quarter without a neck roll. After making an interception, Michael was tackled by the face mask during the return and sustained a ruptured disc at C4-5. Michael was treated with a discectomy and fusion.
Michael filed suit against his high school football coach and the school board as a result of the injuries he sustained. At trial, the court found the coach and staff negligent for failing to require a "player to wear available protective equipment to minimize the risk of a player being injured when tackled, even by actions that violate game rules, such as the ‘face mask' and ‘late hit' infractions for which penalty flags are thrown."59 The judgment totaled $215,000 including $35,000 for "loss of opportunity to play college football." The total judgment was reduced by 20% for Michael's portion of his comparative fault.60
Maldonado v. Gateway Hotel Holdings, L.L.C.
A 23-year-old professional boxer, Fernando Maldonado, was knocked out in a fight at the Gateway Hotel in St. Louis in 1999. After being revived, Maldonado walked to his dressing room, where he lost consciousness. There was no ambulance on-site or on standby, nor was medical monitoring provided. Maldonado alleged that the hotel, as the landowner, failed to have an ambulance and medical monitoring on-site, which delayed his treatment, thereby causing significant brain injury and numerous motor and cognitive deficits. The jury found the hotel negligent and awarded $13.7 million in compensatory damages. Although a request for punitive damages was not made, the jury, on its own, assessed punitive damages in the amount of $27.4 million to the verdict, which was later struck by the judge.61
Cerny v. Cedar Bluffs Junior/Senior Public School
In September 1995, Brent Cerny struck his head against the ground while attempting to make a tackle in a football game. Reports indicated that Cerny was dizzy and disoriented but remained in the game for a couple of plays before taking himself out. Cerny returned to the game in the third quarter and played to its conclusion. He participated in practice the following week and was injured again when his helmet struck another player during practice drills. Cerny's doctor testified that he suffered a closed head injury with second concussion syndrome.
In his lawsuit, Cerny advanced several theories of negligence against his coach, including failing to adequately examine, failing to obtain qualified medical attention, and improperly allowing him to return to play. Critical testimony during the trial was conflicting. The judge found that the coach's conduct in evaluating Cerny and permitting him to reenter the game and participate in subsequent practices was consistent with what a reasonable coach would do under like or similar circumstances. The judge's verdict found that the coach was not negligent.62
Pinson v. State of Tennessee
In 1984, Michael Pinson received a blow to his head in a football practice. Shortly afterward, he collapsed and remained unconscious for 10 minutes. The school's athletic trainer examined Pinson and found facial palsy; no control on the left side of the body; unequal pupils; and no response to pain, sound, or movement. Pinson was thereafter immediately rushed to the hospital. The team trainer did not accompany Pinson to the hospital and instead sent a student trainer. Hospital records revealed that the student trainer informed hospital personnel that Pinson had been unconscious for 2 minutes. The school's trainer later appeared at the hospital but never conveyed to hospital personnel the significant neurological findings he had made on the field. Pinson's subsequent symptoms of headache, known by the trainer, together with the trainer's original findings, were never relayed to Pinson's treating doctor, who ultimately allowed Pinson to return to play.
Three weeks after the concussion, Pinson was "kicked in the head" and collapsed unconscious at practice. Surgery revealed a chronic subdural hematoma that had been present likely for 3 to 4 weeks. Pinson remained in a coma for several weeks following his brain surgery and became hemiparetic.
At a commissioner's trial, the school's trainer was found negligent for failing to communicate Pinson's neurological signs and symptoms to the emergency room and treating physician. Damages of $300,000 were assessed against the school trainer and the school.63
Rosada v. State of New York
John Rosado, a state detainee, filed suit against the state as a result of a fractured skull he sustained when he fell while playing basketball at the detention center. Rosado alleged that the state was negligent for using concrete floors instead of hardwood. The court found that no duty existed to use wooden basketball floors, and judgment was entered against Rosado.64
Regan v. State of New York
In Regan v. State of New York, a young college rugby player suffered a broken neck while practicing as a member of the rugby club and was rendered quadriplegic. The player filed a lawsuit against the state university alleging inter alia, negligent supervision of the practice. The court dismissed the claim, finding that the player had assumed the risk of "those injury-causing events which are known, apparent, or reasonably foreseeable consequences of their own participation."65
Lessons to Be Learned
As demonstrated by the previously discussed cases, the application of the law is not a mechanical approach. The outcome of each case is dependent on its own unique facts. As such, there is no bright-line rule or specific course of conduct that the law prescribes to avoid liability completely. As in all negligence claims, in a claim against a medical provider or responsible person involving a sport-related injury, the defendant will be evaluated under the "reasonable person" standard. Thus, in order to avoid liability, she must act as a reasonable medical provider, trainer, coach, or other professional would under the same or similar circumstances.
Read more from Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes, and Arthur L. Day.
Neurological hand injuries in bowling
Bowling can be traced back more than 5,000 years ago to Egypt. In the 1930s, a British anthropologist named Sir Flinders Petrie discovered a collection of objects in a child’s tomb in Egypt that appeared to have been used for a primitive form of bowling.
Bowling can be traced back more than 5,000 years ago to Egypt. In the 1930s, a British anthropologist named Sir Flinders Petrie discovered a collection of objects in a child's tomb in Egypt that appeared to have been used for a primitive form of bowling. A crude version of a bowling ball and primitive pins were all sized for a child. A similar game evolved during the Roman Empire that entailed tossing stone objects as close as possible to other stone objects. This game became popular with soldiers and eventually evolved into Italian bocce (considered a form of outdoor bowling). The game has continued to evolve and today is a sport enjoyed by more than 100 million people in more than 90 countries each year and is considered a timeless sport.[ 97]
Although not typically thought of as a sport with a high risk of injury, bowling can be both physically and psychologically demanding. Tremendous force is applied to the body throughout a bowler's stance, approach, pivot step, arm swing, release, and follow-through. Repetitive stress is applied to the entire upper extremity including the fingers, wrist, and elbow. Injuries may vary by age as well. A recent study examined bowling-related injuries presenting to U.S. emergency departments between 1990 and 2008.[ 162] The authors analyzed data from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission's National Electronic Injury Surveillance System and found that children younger than 7 years had a higher proportion of finger injuries and injuries from dropping the ball than individuals older than 7 years. On the other hand, bowlers more than 65 years old sustained a greater proportion of injuries related to falling, slipping, or tripping.
While the annual incidence of injury is extremely low, the sport can cause a spectrum of neurologic hand and upper extremity injuries, either acute or due to overuse. Injuries to the fingers and digital nerves can occur. One report described a bowler with a rare traumatic dislocation of the four long fingers.[197] More commonly, though, the repetitive nature of bowling can lead to injuries to the digital nerve of the thumb, which most bowlers place inside the ball holes; this is referred to as "cherry pitter's thumb"[337] (figure 1.2). Perineural fibrosis of the digital nerve of the thumb[297, 351] and even cases of thumb neuromas have been described.[164, 165] Dobyns and colleagues reported on one of the largest series of these patients.[78] Patients may present with a positive Tinel's sign and skin atrophy or callusing over the neuroma. The nerve may ultimately become atrophied with fibrous tissue proliferation at the site of injury. Not to be forgotten, neck and back pain can also occur in bowling and is often the result of discogenic injury.[ 228]
http://www.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/129/E5835_467544_ebook_Main.jpg
http://www.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/129/E5835_467545_ebook_Main.jpg
Bowler's thumb. This patient was taken to surgery because he did not respond to conservative therapy after a clinical diagnosis of bowler's thumb. At surgery, the digital nerve was markedly enlarged secondary to perineural fibrosis. (a) The enlarged ulnar digital nerve (arrows) is surrounded by perineural fibrosis producing an irregular rather than a normal smooth contour. Definitive surgical therapy consisted of neurolysis with careful removal of perineural fibrotic tissue. (b) The nerve is smaller and has a smoother contour following neurolysis. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was able to eventually return to bowling.
Reprinted from M.F. Showalter, D.H. Flemming, and S.A. Bernard, 2010, "MRI manifestations of bowler's thumb," Radiology Case Reports 6: 458. By permission of D.H. Flemming.
Read more from Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes, and Arthur L. Day.
Injuries to the cervical nerve root and brachial plexus neurapraxia
Cervical nerve root and brachial plexus neurapraxia are known by several colloquialisms, such as "burners" or "stingers." Stretching of the upper trunk of the brachial plexus accounts for the majority of these syndromes.
Cervical nerve root and brachial plexus neurapraxia are known by several colloquialisms, such as "burners" or "stingers." Stretching of the upper trunk of the brachial plexus accounts for the majority of these syndromes. Downward traction of the shoulder associated with lateral flexion of the neck to the opposite side is the proposed mechanism of injury in many cases. A similar pattern can be seen with a direct injury to the plexus by an external force applied to the supraclavicular area. The neurologic deficit in almost all of these cases includes the upper portion of the plexus, with weakness of the deltoid, biceps, and shoulder rotator muscles, and numbness extending down to the thumb and index finger (figure 16.4).
http://www.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/129/E5835_467731_ebook_Main.jpg
Plexus or root injuries. (a) Schematic: brachial plexus. Note its origins from the C5 through T1 nerve roots. UT = upper trunk, formed by a merger of the anterior divisions of the C5 and C6 roots. (b) Mechanisms of plexus versus root injury: The superior position of the upper trunk makes it most vulnerable to direct blows or stretching from distraction of the neck away from the shoulder. In contrast, a root may also be injured by lateral flexion of the neck toward the side of symptoms, associated with foraminal narrowing, especially in the presence of an underlying disc herniation or osteophyte.
Any other pattern of radicular symptoms is more suggestive of an isolated nerve root injury. The C5 and C6 nerve roots are most commonly affected, due to transient neural foraminal narrowing from a compressive axial force. An underlying osteophyte or disc rupture is identified in many of these cases.
Read more from Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes, and Arthur L. Day.
Theories of negligence in sports-related injury cases
Many different theories of negligence have arisen over the years in litigation concerning injuries sustained during contact sports. These theories are limited only by the innovative thought processes of skilled attorneys.
Many different theories of negligence have arisen over the years in litigation concerning injuries sustained during contact sports. These theories are limited only by the innovative thought processes of skilled attorneys. Nonetheless, final judgment is always decided by our judiciary, which is charged with ensuring compliance with the law. Although the system is not perfect (none are), our civil justice system allows theories regulated by rules of procedure and evidence to be subjected to a judgment by our peers with constant judicial oversight. An additional safeguard is provided through appellate review.
The following negligence claims frequently appear in sports-related injury cases:
- Failure to properly train
- Failure to be properly credentialed
- Inadequate supervision45
- Failure to properly observe, refer, or stabilize the injured player
- Unequal matching of opponents (boxing)
- Improper return to play46, 47
- Improper equipment or fitting
- Improper screening or physicals
- Failure to warn of risks
- Failure to enact proper rules for concussions or return to play
- Failure to stop or curtail risky or violent conduct
- Medical malpractice48
- Negligent hiring or retention of personnel
- Improper design or maintenance of playing field or premises
- Failure to have an emergency medical plan49
- Improper medical clearance50
This list of claims is not meant to be all-inclusive, but rather sets forth various examples of claims that have been made in recent years. Irrespective of the type of claim, there must always be evidence sufficient to support a finding of each of the four elements of negligence, that is, duty, breach, causation, and damages.
Product liability cases stand alone in a separate category. These claims are typically filed against the manufacturer or distributor of the equipment, alleging that the product was defective in design or manufacture or that the manufacturer failed to warn of known dangers with the use of the product. Some product cases may also include an allegation that the product was unsafe for its intended purpose.51 An example of a products liability claim is Daniels v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, Inc. , 52 wherein a high school football player sustained permanent brain damage when his helmet "caved in" during a collision with another player. The injured player brought a products liability and negligence claim against the helmet manufacturer. The jury found that the helmet was defectively manufactured and that the manufacturer had a duty to warn that the helmet would not protect a player against head and brain injuries. A judgment was rendered against the manufacturer for $750,000 in compensatory damages and $750,000 in punitive damages.
Cases of Interest
It is impossible to predict all of the factual scenarios people will encounter that could subject them to potential liability arising from a sport-related contact or neurological injury. Examining prior legal cases and their results, however, can provide guidance as to what is and is not acceptable conduct when one is confronted with a sport-related injury. The doctrine of stare decisis requires courts of law "to follow earlier judicial decisions when the same points arise again in litigation."53, 54 Courts of law adhere to stare decisis because it provides continuity and predictability in our legal system and further provides notice to society as to what one's rights, duties, and obligations are.55, 56
As noted previously, the public has only recently begun to learn about the serious consequences of concussions and head trauma in contact sports. Because of this, there are limited published legal opinions addressing these issues as compared to other traditional areas of tort law. It can be expected that the law on this subject will continue to develop rapidly to keep pace with advancing research and science. The following cases are a sample of judicial opinions from across the country that demonstrate how courts have addressed various issues relating to neurological sports injuries. These cases are not intended to cover the full litany of factual patterns that may lead to allegations of liability, and they do not cover all the legal issues implicated in sport injuries. Rather, these cases have been selected to allow the reader to gain insight into how the law is applied to varying factual scenarios.
Harvey v. Ouchita Parish School Board
During his sophomore and junior years, Michael Harvey had established himself as a star player on the West Monroe High School football team in Ouachita Parish, Louisiana. Before the start of his senior year, he sustained two minor neck injuries during football.57 Harvey's father, a chiropractor, treated his son for these injuries and told Michael's coach that Michael had to wear a neck roll in all practices and games for an indefinite period of time to protect his neck from further injury.58
During the second game of his senior season, Michael's neck roll was torn off his shoulder pads and was damaged to the extent it could not be reattached. During halftime of the game, Michael inquired about an extra neck roll with the student trainer, who indicated that there were none. Michael did not ask any of the coaches for a neck roll and returned to play in the third quarter without a neck roll. After making an interception, Michael was tackled by the face mask during the return and sustained a ruptured disc at C4-5. Michael was treated with a discectomy and fusion.
Michael filed suit against his high school football coach and the school board as a result of the injuries he sustained. At trial, the court found the coach and staff negligent for failing to require a "player to wear available protective equipment to minimize the risk of a player being injured when tackled, even by actions that violate game rules, such as the ‘face mask' and ‘late hit' infractions for which penalty flags are thrown."59 The judgment totaled $215,000 including $35,000 for "loss of opportunity to play college football." The total judgment was reduced by 20% for Michael's portion of his comparative fault.60
Maldonado v. Gateway Hotel Holdings, L.L.C.
A 23-year-old professional boxer, Fernando Maldonado, was knocked out in a fight at the Gateway Hotel in St. Louis in 1999. After being revived, Maldonado walked to his dressing room, where he lost consciousness. There was no ambulance on-site or on standby, nor was medical monitoring provided. Maldonado alleged that the hotel, as the landowner, failed to have an ambulance and medical monitoring on-site, which delayed his treatment, thereby causing significant brain injury and numerous motor and cognitive deficits. The jury found the hotel negligent and awarded $13.7 million in compensatory damages. Although a request for punitive damages was not made, the jury, on its own, assessed punitive damages in the amount of $27.4 million to the verdict, which was later struck by the judge.61
Cerny v. Cedar Bluffs Junior/Senior Public School
In September 1995, Brent Cerny struck his head against the ground while attempting to make a tackle in a football game. Reports indicated that Cerny was dizzy and disoriented but remained in the game for a couple of plays before taking himself out. Cerny returned to the game in the third quarter and played to its conclusion. He participated in practice the following week and was injured again when his helmet struck another player during practice drills. Cerny's doctor testified that he suffered a closed head injury with second concussion syndrome.
In his lawsuit, Cerny advanced several theories of negligence against his coach, including failing to adequately examine, failing to obtain qualified medical attention, and improperly allowing him to return to play. Critical testimony during the trial was conflicting. The judge found that the coach's conduct in evaluating Cerny and permitting him to reenter the game and participate in subsequent practices was consistent with what a reasonable coach would do under like or similar circumstances. The judge's verdict found that the coach was not negligent.62
Pinson v. State of Tennessee
In 1984, Michael Pinson received a blow to his head in a football practice. Shortly afterward, he collapsed and remained unconscious for 10 minutes. The school's athletic trainer examined Pinson and found facial palsy; no control on the left side of the body; unequal pupils; and no response to pain, sound, or movement. Pinson was thereafter immediately rushed to the hospital. The team trainer did not accompany Pinson to the hospital and instead sent a student trainer. Hospital records revealed that the student trainer informed hospital personnel that Pinson had been unconscious for 2 minutes. The school's trainer later appeared at the hospital but never conveyed to hospital personnel the significant neurological findings he had made on the field. Pinson's subsequent symptoms of headache, known by the trainer, together with the trainer's original findings, were never relayed to Pinson's treating doctor, who ultimately allowed Pinson to return to play.
Three weeks after the concussion, Pinson was "kicked in the head" and collapsed unconscious at practice. Surgery revealed a chronic subdural hematoma that had been present likely for 3 to 4 weeks. Pinson remained in a coma for several weeks following his brain surgery and became hemiparetic.
At a commissioner's trial, the school's trainer was found negligent for failing to communicate Pinson's neurological signs and symptoms to the emergency room and treating physician. Damages of $300,000 were assessed against the school trainer and the school.63
Rosada v. State of New York
John Rosado, a state detainee, filed suit against the state as a result of a fractured skull he sustained when he fell while playing basketball at the detention center. Rosado alleged that the state was negligent for using concrete floors instead of hardwood. The court found that no duty existed to use wooden basketball floors, and judgment was entered against Rosado.64
Regan v. State of New York
In Regan v. State of New York, a young college rugby player suffered a broken neck while practicing as a member of the rugby club and was rendered quadriplegic. The player filed a lawsuit against the state university alleging inter alia, negligent supervision of the practice. The court dismissed the claim, finding that the player had assumed the risk of "those injury-causing events which are known, apparent, or reasonably foreseeable consequences of their own participation."65
Lessons to Be Learned
As demonstrated by the previously discussed cases, the application of the law is not a mechanical approach. The outcome of each case is dependent on its own unique facts. As such, there is no bright-line rule or specific course of conduct that the law prescribes to avoid liability completely. As in all negligence claims, in a claim against a medical provider or responsible person involving a sport-related injury, the defendant will be evaluated under the "reasonable person" standard. Thus, in order to avoid liability, she must act as a reasonable medical provider, trainer, coach, or other professional would under the same or similar circumstances.
Read more from Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes, and Arthur L. Day.
Neurological hand injuries in bowling
Bowling can be traced back more than 5,000 years ago to Egypt. In the 1930s, a British anthropologist named Sir Flinders Petrie discovered a collection of objects in a child’s tomb in Egypt that appeared to have been used for a primitive form of bowling.
Bowling can be traced back more than 5,000 years ago to Egypt. In the 1930s, a British anthropologist named Sir Flinders Petrie discovered a collection of objects in a child's tomb in Egypt that appeared to have been used for a primitive form of bowling. A crude version of a bowling ball and primitive pins were all sized for a child. A similar game evolved during the Roman Empire that entailed tossing stone objects as close as possible to other stone objects. This game became popular with soldiers and eventually evolved into Italian bocce (considered a form of outdoor bowling). The game has continued to evolve and today is a sport enjoyed by more than 100 million people in more than 90 countries each year and is considered a timeless sport.[ 97]
Although not typically thought of as a sport with a high risk of injury, bowling can be both physically and psychologically demanding. Tremendous force is applied to the body throughout a bowler's stance, approach, pivot step, arm swing, release, and follow-through. Repetitive stress is applied to the entire upper extremity including the fingers, wrist, and elbow. Injuries may vary by age as well. A recent study examined bowling-related injuries presenting to U.S. emergency departments between 1990 and 2008.[ 162] The authors analyzed data from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission's National Electronic Injury Surveillance System and found that children younger than 7 years had a higher proportion of finger injuries and injuries from dropping the ball than individuals older than 7 years. On the other hand, bowlers more than 65 years old sustained a greater proportion of injuries related to falling, slipping, or tripping.
While the annual incidence of injury is extremely low, the sport can cause a spectrum of neurologic hand and upper extremity injuries, either acute or due to overuse. Injuries to the fingers and digital nerves can occur. One report described a bowler with a rare traumatic dislocation of the four long fingers.[197] More commonly, though, the repetitive nature of bowling can lead to injuries to the digital nerve of the thumb, which most bowlers place inside the ball holes; this is referred to as "cherry pitter's thumb"[337] (figure 1.2). Perineural fibrosis of the digital nerve of the thumb[297, 351] and even cases of thumb neuromas have been described.[164, 165] Dobyns and colleagues reported on one of the largest series of these patients.[78] Patients may present with a positive Tinel's sign and skin atrophy or callusing over the neuroma. The nerve may ultimately become atrophied with fibrous tissue proliferation at the site of injury. Not to be forgotten, neck and back pain can also occur in bowling and is often the result of discogenic injury.[ 228]
http://www.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/129/E5835_467544_ebook_Main.jpg
http://www.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/129/E5835_467545_ebook_Main.jpg
Bowler's thumb. This patient was taken to surgery because he did not respond to conservative therapy after a clinical diagnosis of bowler's thumb. At surgery, the digital nerve was markedly enlarged secondary to perineural fibrosis. (a) The enlarged ulnar digital nerve (arrows) is surrounded by perineural fibrosis producing an irregular rather than a normal smooth contour. Definitive surgical therapy consisted of neurolysis with careful removal of perineural fibrotic tissue. (b) The nerve is smaller and has a smoother contour following neurolysis. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was able to eventually return to bowling.
Reprinted from M.F. Showalter, D.H. Flemming, and S.A. Bernard, 2010, "MRI manifestations of bowler's thumb," Radiology Case Reports 6: 458. By permission of D.H. Flemming.
Read more from Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes, and Arthur L. Day.
Injuries to the cervical nerve root and brachial plexus neurapraxia
Cervical nerve root and brachial plexus neurapraxia are known by several colloquialisms, such as "burners" or "stingers." Stretching of the upper trunk of the brachial plexus accounts for the majority of these syndromes.
Cervical nerve root and brachial plexus neurapraxia are known by several colloquialisms, such as "burners" or "stingers." Stretching of the upper trunk of the brachial plexus accounts for the majority of these syndromes. Downward traction of the shoulder associated with lateral flexion of the neck to the opposite side is the proposed mechanism of injury in many cases. A similar pattern can be seen with a direct injury to the plexus by an external force applied to the supraclavicular area. The neurologic deficit in almost all of these cases includes the upper portion of the plexus, with weakness of the deltoid, biceps, and shoulder rotator muscles, and numbness extending down to the thumb and index finger (figure 16.4).
http://www.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/129/E5835_467731_ebook_Main.jpg
Plexus or root injuries. (a) Schematic: brachial plexus. Note its origins from the C5 through T1 nerve roots. UT = upper trunk, formed by a merger of the anterior divisions of the C5 and C6 roots. (b) Mechanisms of plexus versus root injury: The superior position of the upper trunk makes it most vulnerable to direct blows or stretching from distraction of the neck away from the shoulder. In contrast, a root may also be injured by lateral flexion of the neck toward the side of symptoms, associated with foraminal narrowing, especially in the presence of an underlying disc herniation or osteophyte.
Any other pattern of radicular symptoms is more suggestive of an isolated nerve root injury. The C5 and C6 nerve roots are most commonly affected, due to transient neural foraminal narrowing from a compressive axial force. An underlying osteophyte or disc rupture is identified in many of these cases.
Read more from Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes, and Arthur L. Day.
Theories of negligence in sports-related injury cases
Many different theories of negligence have arisen over the years in litigation concerning injuries sustained during contact sports. These theories are limited only by the innovative thought processes of skilled attorneys.
Many different theories of negligence have arisen over the years in litigation concerning injuries sustained during contact sports. These theories are limited only by the innovative thought processes of skilled attorneys. Nonetheless, final judgment is always decided by our judiciary, which is charged with ensuring compliance with the law. Although the system is not perfect (none are), our civil justice system allows theories regulated by rules of procedure and evidence to be subjected to a judgment by our peers with constant judicial oversight. An additional safeguard is provided through appellate review.
The following negligence claims frequently appear in sports-related injury cases:
- Failure to properly train
- Failure to be properly credentialed
- Inadequate supervision45
- Failure to properly observe, refer, or stabilize the injured player
- Unequal matching of opponents (boxing)
- Improper return to play46, 47
- Improper equipment or fitting
- Improper screening or physicals
- Failure to warn of risks
- Failure to enact proper rules for concussions or return to play
- Failure to stop or curtail risky or violent conduct
- Medical malpractice48
- Negligent hiring or retention of personnel
- Improper design or maintenance of playing field or premises
- Failure to have an emergency medical plan49
- Improper medical clearance50
This list of claims is not meant to be all-inclusive, but rather sets forth various examples of claims that have been made in recent years. Irrespective of the type of claim, there must always be evidence sufficient to support a finding of each of the four elements of negligence, that is, duty, breach, causation, and damages.
Product liability cases stand alone in a separate category. These claims are typically filed against the manufacturer or distributor of the equipment, alleging that the product was defective in design or manufacture or that the manufacturer failed to warn of known dangers with the use of the product. Some product cases may also include an allegation that the product was unsafe for its intended purpose.51 An example of a products liability claim is Daniels v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, Inc. , 52 wherein a high school football player sustained permanent brain damage when his helmet "caved in" during a collision with another player. The injured player brought a products liability and negligence claim against the helmet manufacturer. The jury found that the helmet was defectively manufactured and that the manufacturer had a duty to warn that the helmet would not protect a player against head and brain injuries. A judgment was rendered against the manufacturer for $750,000 in compensatory damages and $750,000 in punitive damages.
Cases of Interest
It is impossible to predict all of the factual scenarios people will encounter that could subject them to potential liability arising from a sport-related contact or neurological injury. Examining prior legal cases and their results, however, can provide guidance as to what is and is not acceptable conduct when one is confronted with a sport-related injury. The doctrine of stare decisis requires courts of law "to follow earlier judicial decisions when the same points arise again in litigation."53, 54 Courts of law adhere to stare decisis because it provides continuity and predictability in our legal system and further provides notice to society as to what one's rights, duties, and obligations are.55, 56
As noted previously, the public has only recently begun to learn about the serious consequences of concussions and head trauma in contact sports. Because of this, there are limited published legal opinions addressing these issues as compared to other traditional areas of tort law. It can be expected that the law on this subject will continue to develop rapidly to keep pace with advancing research and science. The following cases are a sample of judicial opinions from across the country that demonstrate how courts have addressed various issues relating to neurological sports injuries. These cases are not intended to cover the full litany of factual patterns that may lead to allegations of liability, and they do not cover all the legal issues implicated in sport injuries. Rather, these cases have been selected to allow the reader to gain insight into how the law is applied to varying factual scenarios.
Harvey v. Ouchita Parish School Board
During his sophomore and junior years, Michael Harvey had established himself as a star player on the West Monroe High School football team in Ouachita Parish, Louisiana. Before the start of his senior year, he sustained two minor neck injuries during football.57 Harvey's father, a chiropractor, treated his son for these injuries and told Michael's coach that Michael had to wear a neck roll in all practices and games for an indefinite period of time to protect his neck from further injury.58
During the second game of his senior season, Michael's neck roll was torn off his shoulder pads and was damaged to the extent it could not be reattached. During halftime of the game, Michael inquired about an extra neck roll with the student trainer, who indicated that there were none. Michael did not ask any of the coaches for a neck roll and returned to play in the third quarter without a neck roll. After making an interception, Michael was tackled by the face mask during the return and sustained a ruptured disc at C4-5. Michael was treated with a discectomy and fusion.
Michael filed suit against his high school football coach and the school board as a result of the injuries he sustained. At trial, the court found the coach and staff negligent for failing to require a "player to wear available protective equipment to minimize the risk of a player being injured when tackled, even by actions that violate game rules, such as the ‘face mask' and ‘late hit' infractions for which penalty flags are thrown."59 The judgment totaled $215,000 including $35,000 for "loss of opportunity to play college football." The total judgment was reduced by 20% for Michael's portion of his comparative fault.60
Maldonado v. Gateway Hotel Holdings, L.L.C.
A 23-year-old professional boxer, Fernando Maldonado, was knocked out in a fight at the Gateway Hotel in St. Louis in 1999. After being revived, Maldonado walked to his dressing room, where he lost consciousness. There was no ambulance on-site or on standby, nor was medical monitoring provided. Maldonado alleged that the hotel, as the landowner, failed to have an ambulance and medical monitoring on-site, which delayed his treatment, thereby causing significant brain injury and numerous motor and cognitive deficits. The jury found the hotel negligent and awarded $13.7 million in compensatory damages. Although a request for punitive damages was not made, the jury, on its own, assessed punitive damages in the amount of $27.4 million to the verdict, which was later struck by the judge.61
Cerny v. Cedar Bluffs Junior/Senior Public School
In September 1995, Brent Cerny struck his head against the ground while attempting to make a tackle in a football game. Reports indicated that Cerny was dizzy and disoriented but remained in the game for a couple of plays before taking himself out. Cerny returned to the game in the third quarter and played to its conclusion. He participated in practice the following week and was injured again when his helmet struck another player during practice drills. Cerny's doctor testified that he suffered a closed head injury with second concussion syndrome.
In his lawsuit, Cerny advanced several theories of negligence against his coach, including failing to adequately examine, failing to obtain qualified medical attention, and improperly allowing him to return to play. Critical testimony during the trial was conflicting. The judge found that the coach's conduct in evaluating Cerny and permitting him to reenter the game and participate in subsequent practices was consistent with what a reasonable coach would do under like or similar circumstances. The judge's verdict found that the coach was not negligent.62
Pinson v. State of Tennessee
In 1984, Michael Pinson received a blow to his head in a football practice. Shortly afterward, he collapsed and remained unconscious for 10 minutes. The school's athletic trainer examined Pinson and found facial palsy; no control on the left side of the body; unequal pupils; and no response to pain, sound, or movement. Pinson was thereafter immediately rushed to the hospital. The team trainer did not accompany Pinson to the hospital and instead sent a student trainer. Hospital records revealed that the student trainer informed hospital personnel that Pinson had been unconscious for 2 minutes. The school's trainer later appeared at the hospital but never conveyed to hospital personnel the significant neurological findings he had made on the field. Pinson's subsequent symptoms of headache, known by the trainer, together with the trainer's original findings, were never relayed to Pinson's treating doctor, who ultimately allowed Pinson to return to play.
Three weeks after the concussion, Pinson was "kicked in the head" and collapsed unconscious at practice. Surgery revealed a chronic subdural hematoma that had been present likely for 3 to 4 weeks. Pinson remained in a coma for several weeks following his brain surgery and became hemiparetic.
At a commissioner's trial, the school's trainer was found negligent for failing to communicate Pinson's neurological signs and symptoms to the emergency room and treating physician. Damages of $300,000 were assessed against the school trainer and the school.63
Rosada v. State of New York
John Rosado, a state detainee, filed suit against the state as a result of a fractured skull he sustained when he fell while playing basketball at the detention center. Rosado alleged that the state was negligent for using concrete floors instead of hardwood. The court found that no duty existed to use wooden basketball floors, and judgment was entered against Rosado.64
Regan v. State of New York
In Regan v. State of New York, a young college rugby player suffered a broken neck while practicing as a member of the rugby club and was rendered quadriplegic. The player filed a lawsuit against the state university alleging inter alia, negligent supervision of the practice. The court dismissed the claim, finding that the player had assumed the risk of "those injury-causing events which are known, apparent, or reasonably foreseeable consequences of their own participation."65
Lessons to Be Learned
As demonstrated by the previously discussed cases, the application of the law is not a mechanical approach. The outcome of each case is dependent on its own unique facts. As such, there is no bright-line rule or specific course of conduct that the law prescribes to avoid liability completely. As in all negligence claims, in a claim against a medical provider or responsible person involving a sport-related injury, the defendant will be evaluated under the "reasonable person" standard. Thus, in order to avoid liability, she must act as a reasonable medical provider, trainer, coach, or other professional would under the same or similar circumstances.
Read more from Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes, and Arthur L. Day.
Neurological hand injuries in bowling
Bowling can be traced back more than 5,000 years ago to Egypt. In the 1930s, a British anthropologist named Sir Flinders Petrie discovered a collection of objects in a child’s tomb in Egypt that appeared to have been used for a primitive form of bowling.
Bowling can be traced back more than 5,000 years ago to Egypt. In the 1930s, a British anthropologist named Sir Flinders Petrie discovered a collection of objects in a child's tomb in Egypt that appeared to have been used for a primitive form of bowling. A crude version of a bowling ball and primitive pins were all sized for a child. A similar game evolved during the Roman Empire that entailed tossing stone objects as close as possible to other stone objects. This game became popular with soldiers and eventually evolved into Italian bocce (considered a form of outdoor bowling). The game has continued to evolve and today is a sport enjoyed by more than 100 million people in more than 90 countries each year and is considered a timeless sport.[ 97]
Although not typically thought of as a sport with a high risk of injury, bowling can be both physically and psychologically demanding. Tremendous force is applied to the body throughout a bowler's stance, approach, pivot step, arm swing, release, and follow-through. Repetitive stress is applied to the entire upper extremity including the fingers, wrist, and elbow. Injuries may vary by age as well. A recent study examined bowling-related injuries presenting to U.S. emergency departments between 1990 and 2008.[ 162] The authors analyzed data from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission's National Electronic Injury Surveillance System and found that children younger than 7 years had a higher proportion of finger injuries and injuries from dropping the ball than individuals older than 7 years. On the other hand, bowlers more than 65 years old sustained a greater proportion of injuries related to falling, slipping, or tripping.
While the annual incidence of injury is extremely low, the sport can cause a spectrum of neurologic hand and upper extremity injuries, either acute or due to overuse. Injuries to the fingers and digital nerves can occur. One report described a bowler with a rare traumatic dislocation of the four long fingers.[197] More commonly, though, the repetitive nature of bowling can lead to injuries to the digital nerve of the thumb, which most bowlers place inside the ball holes; this is referred to as "cherry pitter's thumb"[337] (figure 1.2). Perineural fibrosis of the digital nerve of the thumb[297, 351] and even cases of thumb neuromas have been described.[164, 165] Dobyns and colleagues reported on one of the largest series of these patients.[78] Patients may present with a positive Tinel's sign and skin atrophy or callusing over the neuroma. The nerve may ultimately become atrophied with fibrous tissue proliferation at the site of injury. Not to be forgotten, neck and back pain can also occur in bowling and is often the result of discogenic injury.[ 228]
http://www.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/129/E5835_467544_ebook_Main.jpg
http://www.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/129/E5835_467545_ebook_Main.jpg
Bowler's thumb. This patient was taken to surgery because he did not respond to conservative therapy after a clinical diagnosis of bowler's thumb. At surgery, the digital nerve was markedly enlarged secondary to perineural fibrosis. (a) The enlarged ulnar digital nerve (arrows) is surrounded by perineural fibrosis producing an irregular rather than a normal smooth contour. Definitive surgical therapy consisted of neurolysis with careful removal of perineural fibrotic tissue. (b) The nerve is smaller and has a smoother contour following neurolysis. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was able to eventually return to bowling.
Reprinted from M.F. Showalter, D.H. Flemming, and S.A. Bernard, 2010, "MRI manifestations of bowler's thumb," Radiology Case Reports 6: 458. By permission of D.H. Flemming.
Read more from Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes, and Arthur L. Day.
Injuries to the cervical nerve root and brachial plexus neurapraxia
Cervical nerve root and brachial plexus neurapraxia are known by several colloquialisms, such as "burners" or "stingers." Stretching of the upper trunk of the brachial plexus accounts for the majority of these syndromes.
Cervical nerve root and brachial plexus neurapraxia are known by several colloquialisms, such as "burners" or "stingers." Stretching of the upper trunk of the brachial plexus accounts for the majority of these syndromes. Downward traction of the shoulder associated with lateral flexion of the neck to the opposite side is the proposed mechanism of injury in many cases. A similar pattern can be seen with a direct injury to the plexus by an external force applied to the supraclavicular area. The neurologic deficit in almost all of these cases includes the upper portion of the plexus, with weakness of the deltoid, biceps, and shoulder rotator muscles, and numbness extending down to the thumb and index finger (figure 16.4).
http://www.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/129/E5835_467731_ebook_Main.jpg
Plexus or root injuries. (a) Schematic: brachial plexus. Note its origins from the C5 through T1 nerve roots. UT = upper trunk, formed by a merger of the anterior divisions of the C5 and C6 roots. (b) Mechanisms of plexus versus root injury: The superior position of the upper trunk makes it most vulnerable to direct blows or stretching from distraction of the neck away from the shoulder. In contrast, a root may also be injured by lateral flexion of the neck toward the side of symptoms, associated with foraminal narrowing, especially in the presence of an underlying disc herniation or osteophyte.
Any other pattern of radicular symptoms is more suggestive of an isolated nerve root injury. The C5 and C6 nerve roots are most commonly affected, due to transient neural foraminal narrowing from a compressive axial force. An underlying osteophyte or disc rupture is identified in many of these cases.
Read more from Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes, and Arthur L. Day.
Theories of negligence in sports-related injury cases
Many different theories of negligence have arisen over the years in litigation concerning injuries sustained during contact sports. These theories are limited only by the innovative thought processes of skilled attorneys.
Many different theories of negligence have arisen over the years in litigation concerning injuries sustained during contact sports. These theories are limited only by the innovative thought processes of skilled attorneys. Nonetheless, final judgment is always decided by our judiciary, which is charged with ensuring compliance with the law. Although the system is not perfect (none are), our civil justice system allows theories regulated by rules of procedure and evidence to be subjected to a judgment by our peers with constant judicial oversight. An additional safeguard is provided through appellate review.
The following negligence claims frequently appear in sports-related injury cases:
- Failure to properly train
- Failure to be properly credentialed
- Inadequate supervision45
- Failure to properly observe, refer, or stabilize the injured player
- Unequal matching of opponents (boxing)
- Improper return to play46, 47
- Improper equipment or fitting
- Improper screening or physicals
- Failure to warn of risks
- Failure to enact proper rules for concussions or return to play
- Failure to stop or curtail risky or violent conduct
- Medical malpractice48
- Negligent hiring or retention of personnel
- Improper design or maintenance of playing field or premises
- Failure to have an emergency medical plan49
- Improper medical clearance50
This list of claims is not meant to be all-inclusive, but rather sets forth various examples of claims that have been made in recent years. Irrespective of the type of claim, there must always be evidence sufficient to support a finding of each of the four elements of negligence, that is, duty, breach, causation, and damages.
Product liability cases stand alone in a separate category. These claims are typically filed against the manufacturer or distributor of the equipment, alleging that the product was defective in design or manufacture or that the manufacturer failed to warn of known dangers with the use of the product. Some product cases may also include an allegation that the product was unsafe for its intended purpose.51 An example of a products liability claim is Daniels v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, Inc. , 52 wherein a high school football player sustained permanent brain damage when his helmet "caved in" during a collision with another player. The injured player brought a products liability and negligence claim against the helmet manufacturer. The jury found that the helmet was defectively manufactured and that the manufacturer had a duty to warn that the helmet would not protect a player against head and brain injuries. A judgment was rendered against the manufacturer for $750,000 in compensatory damages and $750,000 in punitive damages.
Cases of Interest
It is impossible to predict all of the factual scenarios people will encounter that could subject them to potential liability arising from a sport-related contact or neurological injury. Examining prior legal cases and their results, however, can provide guidance as to what is and is not acceptable conduct when one is confronted with a sport-related injury. The doctrine of stare decisis requires courts of law "to follow earlier judicial decisions when the same points arise again in litigation."53, 54 Courts of law adhere to stare decisis because it provides continuity and predictability in our legal system and further provides notice to society as to what one's rights, duties, and obligations are.55, 56
As noted previously, the public has only recently begun to learn about the serious consequences of concussions and head trauma in contact sports. Because of this, there are limited published legal opinions addressing these issues as compared to other traditional areas of tort law. It can be expected that the law on this subject will continue to develop rapidly to keep pace with advancing research and science. The following cases are a sample of judicial opinions from across the country that demonstrate how courts have addressed various issues relating to neurological sports injuries. These cases are not intended to cover the full litany of factual patterns that may lead to allegations of liability, and they do not cover all the legal issues implicated in sport injuries. Rather, these cases have been selected to allow the reader to gain insight into how the law is applied to varying factual scenarios.
Harvey v. Ouchita Parish School Board
During his sophomore and junior years, Michael Harvey had established himself as a star player on the West Monroe High School football team in Ouachita Parish, Louisiana. Before the start of his senior year, he sustained two minor neck injuries during football.57 Harvey's father, a chiropractor, treated his son for these injuries and told Michael's coach that Michael had to wear a neck roll in all practices and games for an indefinite period of time to protect his neck from further injury.58
During the second game of his senior season, Michael's neck roll was torn off his shoulder pads and was damaged to the extent it could not be reattached. During halftime of the game, Michael inquired about an extra neck roll with the student trainer, who indicated that there were none. Michael did not ask any of the coaches for a neck roll and returned to play in the third quarter without a neck roll. After making an interception, Michael was tackled by the face mask during the return and sustained a ruptured disc at C4-5. Michael was treated with a discectomy and fusion.
Michael filed suit against his high school football coach and the school board as a result of the injuries he sustained. At trial, the court found the coach and staff negligent for failing to require a "player to wear available protective equipment to minimize the risk of a player being injured when tackled, even by actions that violate game rules, such as the ‘face mask' and ‘late hit' infractions for which penalty flags are thrown."59 The judgment totaled $215,000 including $35,000 for "loss of opportunity to play college football." The total judgment was reduced by 20% for Michael's portion of his comparative fault.60
Maldonado v. Gateway Hotel Holdings, L.L.C.
A 23-year-old professional boxer, Fernando Maldonado, was knocked out in a fight at the Gateway Hotel in St. Louis in 1999. After being revived, Maldonado walked to his dressing room, where he lost consciousness. There was no ambulance on-site or on standby, nor was medical monitoring provided. Maldonado alleged that the hotel, as the landowner, failed to have an ambulance and medical monitoring on-site, which delayed his treatment, thereby causing significant brain injury and numerous motor and cognitive deficits. The jury found the hotel negligent and awarded $13.7 million in compensatory damages. Although a request for punitive damages was not made, the jury, on its own, assessed punitive damages in the amount of $27.4 million to the verdict, which was later struck by the judge.61
Cerny v. Cedar Bluffs Junior/Senior Public School
In September 1995, Brent Cerny struck his head against the ground while attempting to make a tackle in a football game. Reports indicated that Cerny was dizzy and disoriented but remained in the game for a couple of plays before taking himself out. Cerny returned to the game in the third quarter and played to its conclusion. He participated in practice the following week and was injured again when his helmet struck another player during practice drills. Cerny's doctor testified that he suffered a closed head injury with second concussion syndrome.
In his lawsuit, Cerny advanced several theories of negligence against his coach, including failing to adequately examine, failing to obtain qualified medical attention, and improperly allowing him to return to play. Critical testimony during the trial was conflicting. The judge found that the coach's conduct in evaluating Cerny and permitting him to reenter the game and participate in subsequent practices was consistent with what a reasonable coach would do under like or similar circumstances. The judge's verdict found that the coach was not negligent.62
Pinson v. State of Tennessee
In 1984, Michael Pinson received a blow to his head in a football practice. Shortly afterward, he collapsed and remained unconscious for 10 minutes. The school's athletic trainer examined Pinson and found facial palsy; no control on the left side of the body; unequal pupils; and no response to pain, sound, or movement. Pinson was thereafter immediately rushed to the hospital. The team trainer did not accompany Pinson to the hospital and instead sent a student trainer. Hospital records revealed that the student trainer informed hospital personnel that Pinson had been unconscious for 2 minutes. The school's trainer later appeared at the hospital but never conveyed to hospital personnel the significant neurological findings he had made on the field. Pinson's subsequent symptoms of headache, known by the trainer, together with the trainer's original findings, were never relayed to Pinson's treating doctor, who ultimately allowed Pinson to return to play.
Three weeks after the concussion, Pinson was "kicked in the head" and collapsed unconscious at practice. Surgery revealed a chronic subdural hematoma that had been present likely for 3 to 4 weeks. Pinson remained in a coma for several weeks following his brain surgery and became hemiparetic.
At a commissioner's trial, the school's trainer was found negligent for failing to communicate Pinson's neurological signs and symptoms to the emergency room and treating physician. Damages of $300,000 were assessed against the school trainer and the school.63
Rosada v. State of New York
John Rosado, a state detainee, filed suit against the state as a result of a fractured skull he sustained when he fell while playing basketball at the detention center. Rosado alleged that the state was negligent for using concrete floors instead of hardwood. The court found that no duty existed to use wooden basketball floors, and judgment was entered against Rosado.64
Regan v. State of New York
In Regan v. State of New York, a young college rugby player suffered a broken neck while practicing as a member of the rugby club and was rendered quadriplegic. The player filed a lawsuit against the state university alleging inter alia, negligent supervision of the practice. The court dismissed the claim, finding that the player had assumed the risk of "those injury-causing events which are known, apparent, or reasonably foreseeable consequences of their own participation."65
Lessons to Be Learned
As demonstrated by the previously discussed cases, the application of the law is not a mechanical approach. The outcome of each case is dependent on its own unique facts. As such, there is no bright-line rule or specific course of conduct that the law prescribes to avoid liability completely. As in all negligence claims, in a claim against a medical provider or responsible person involving a sport-related injury, the defendant will be evaluated under the "reasonable person" standard. Thus, in order to avoid liability, she must act as a reasonable medical provider, trainer, coach, or other professional would under the same or similar circumstances.
Read more from Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes, and Arthur L. Day.
Neurological hand injuries in bowling
Bowling can be traced back more than 5,000 years ago to Egypt. In the 1930s, a British anthropologist named Sir Flinders Petrie discovered a collection of objects in a child’s tomb in Egypt that appeared to have been used for a primitive form of bowling.
Bowling can be traced back more than 5,000 years ago to Egypt. In the 1930s, a British anthropologist named Sir Flinders Petrie discovered a collection of objects in a child's tomb in Egypt that appeared to have been used for a primitive form of bowling. A crude version of a bowling ball and primitive pins were all sized for a child. A similar game evolved during the Roman Empire that entailed tossing stone objects as close as possible to other stone objects. This game became popular with soldiers and eventually evolved into Italian bocce (considered a form of outdoor bowling). The game has continued to evolve and today is a sport enjoyed by more than 100 million people in more than 90 countries each year and is considered a timeless sport.[ 97]
Although not typically thought of as a sport with a high risk of injury, bowling can be both physically and psychologically demanding. Tremendous force is applied to the body throughout a bowler's stance, approach, pivot step, arm swing, release, and follow-through. Repetitive stress is applied to the entire upper extremity including the fingers, wrist, and elbow. Injuries may vary by age as well. A recent study examined bowling-related injuries presenting to U.S. emergency departments between 1990 and 2008.[ 162] The authors analyzed data from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission's National Electronic Injury Surveillance System and found that children younger than 7 years had a higher proportion of finger injuries and injuries from dropping the ball than individuals older than 7 years. On the other hand, bowlers more than 65 years old sustained a greater proportion of injuries related to falling, slipping, or tripping.
While the annual incidence of injury is extremely low, the sport can cause a spectrum of neurologic hand and upper extremity injuries, either acute or due to overuse. Injuries to the fingers and digital nerves can occur. One report described a bowler with a rare traumatic dislocation of the four long fingers.[197] More commonly, though, the repetitive nature of bowling can lead to injuries to the digital nerve of the thumb, which most bowlers place inside the ball holes; this is referred to as "cherry pitter's thumb"[337] (figure 1.2). Perineural fibrosis of the digital nerve of the thumb[297, 351] and even cases of thumb neuromas have been described.[164, 165] Dobyns and colleagues reported on one of the largest series of these patients.[78] Patients may present with a positive Tinel's sign and skin atrophy or callusing over the neuroma. The nerve may ultimately become atrophied with fibrous tissue proliferation at the site of injury. Not to be forgotten, neck and back pain can also occur in bowling and is often the result of discogenic injury.[ 228]
http://www.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/129/E5835_467544_ebook_Main.jpg
http://www.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/129/E5835_467545_ebook_Main.jpg
Bowler's thumb. This patient was taken to surgery because he did not respond to conservative therapy after a clinical diagnosis of bowler's thumb. At surgery, the digital nerve was markedly enlarged secondary to perineural fibrosis. (a) The enlarged ulnar digital nerve (arrows) is surrounded by perineural fibrosis producing an irregular rather than a normal smooth contour. Definitive surgical therapy consisted of neurolysis with careful removal of perineural fibrotic tissue. (b) The nerve is smaller and has a smoother contour following neurolysis. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was able to eventually return to bowling.
Reprinted from M.F. Showalter, D.H. Flemming, and S.A. Bernard, 2010, "MRI manifestations of bowler's thumb," Radiology Case Reports 6: 458. By permission of D.H. Flemming.
Read more from Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes, and Arthur L. Day.
Injuries to the cervical nerve root and brachial plexus neurapraxia
Cervical nerve root and brachial plexus neurapraxia are known by several colloquialisms, such as "burners" or "stingers." Stretching of the upper trunk of the brachial plexus accounts for the majority of these syndromes.
Cervical nerve root and brachial plexus neurapraxia are known by several colloquialisms, such as "burners" or "stingers." Stretching of the upper trunk of the brachial plexus accounts for the majority of these syndromes. Downward traction of the shoulder associated with lateral flexion of the neck to the opposite side is the proposed mechanism of injury in many cases. A similar pattern can be seen with a direct injury to the plexus by an external force applied to the supraclavicular area. The neurologic deficit in almost all of these cases includes the upper portion of the plexus, with weakness of the deltoid, biceps, and shoulder rotator muscles, and numbness extending down to the thumb and index finger (figure 16.4).
http://www.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/129/E5835_467731_ebook_Main.jpg
Plexus or root injuries. (a) Schematic: brachial plexus. Note its origins from the C5 through T1 nerve roots. UT = upper trunk, formed by a merger of the anterior divisions of the C5 and C6 roots. (b) Mechanisms of plexus versus root injury: The superior position of the upper trunk makes it most vulnerable to direct blows or stretching from distraction of the neck away from the shoulder. In contrast, a root may also be injured by lateral flexion of the neck toward the side of symptoms, associated with foraminal narrowing, especially in the presence of an underlying disc herniation or osteophyte.
Any other pattern of radicular symptoms is more suggestive of an isolated nerve root injury. The C5 and C6 nerve roots are most commonly affected, due to transient neural foraminal narrowing from a compressive axial force. An underlying osteophyte or disc rupture is identified in many of these cases.
Read more from Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes, and Arthur L. Day.
Theories of negligence in sports-related injury cases
Many different theories of negligence have arisen over the years in litigation concerning injuries sustained during contact sports. These theories are limited only by the innovative thought processes of skilled attorneys.
Many different theories of negligence have arisen over the years in litigation concerning injuries sustained during contact sports. These theories are limited only by the innovative thought processes of skilled attorneys. Nonetheless, final judgment is always decided by our judiciary, which is charged with ensuring compliance with the law. Although the system is not perfect (none are), our civil justice system allows theories regulated by rules of procedure and evidence to be subjected to a judgment by our peers with constant judicial oversight. An additional safeguard is provided through appellate review.
The following negligence claims frequently appear in sports-related injury cases:
- Failure to properly train
- Failure to be properly credentialed
- Inadequate supervision45
- Failure to properly observe, refer, or stabilize the injured player
- Unequal matching of opponents (boxing)
- Improper return to play46, 47
- Improper equipment or fitting
- Improper screening or physicals
- Failure to warn of risks
- Failure to enact proper rules for concussions or return to play
- Failure to stop or curtail risky or violent conduct
- Medical malpractice48
- Negligent hiring or retention of personnel
- Improper design or maintenance of playing field or premises
- Failure to have an emergency medical plan49
- Improper medical clearance50
This list of claims is not meant to be all-inclusive, but rather sets forth various examples of claims that have been made in recent years. Irrespective of the type of claim, there must always be evidence sufficient to support a finding of each of the four elements of negligence, that is, duty, breach, causation, and damages.
Product liability cases stand alone in a separate category. These claims are typically filed against the manufacturer or distributor of the equipment, alleging that the product was defective in design or manufacture or that the manufacturer failed to warn of known dangers with the use of the product. Some product cases may also include an allegation that the product was unsafe for its intended purpose.51 An example of a products liability claim is Daniels v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, Inc. , 52 wherein a high school football player sustained permanent brain damage when his helmet "caved in" during a collision with another player. The injured player brought a products liability and negligence claim against the helmet manufacturer. The jury found that the helmet was defectively manufactured and that the manufacturer had a duty to warn that the helmet would not protect a player against head and brain injuries. A judgment was rendered against the manufacturer for $750,000 in compensatory damages and $750,000 in punitive damages.
Cases of Interest
It is impossible to predict all of the factual scenarios people will encounter that could subject them to potential liability arising from a sport-related contact or neurological injury. Examining prior legal cases and their results, however, can provide guidance as to what is and is not acceptable conduct when one is confronted with a sport-related injury. The doctrine of stare decisis requires courts of law "to follow earlier judicial decisions when the same points arise again in litigation."53, 54 Courts of law adhere to stare decisis because it provides continuity and predictability in our legal system and further provides notice to society as to what one's rights, duties, and obligations are.55, 56
As noted previously, the public has only recently begun to learn about the serious consequences of concussions and head trauma in contact sports. Because of this, there are limited published legal opinions addressing these issues as compared to other traditional areas of tort law. It can be expected that the law on this subject will continue to develop rapidly to keep pace with advancing research and science. The following cases are a sample of judicial opinions from across the country that demonstrate how courts have addressed various issues relating to neurological sports injuries. These cases are not intended to cover the full litany of factual patterns that may lead to allegations of liability, and they do not cover all the legal issues implicated in sport injuries. Rather, these cases have been selected to allow the reader to gain insight into how the law is applied to varying factual scenarios.
Harvey v. Ouchita Parish School Board
During his sophomore and junior years, Michael Harvey had established himself as a star player on the West Monroe High School football team in Ouachita Parish, Louisiana. Before the start of his senior year, he sustained two minor neck injuries during football.57 Harvey's father, a chiropractor, treated his son for these injuries and told Michael's coach that Michael had to wear a neck roll in all practices and games for an indefinite period of time to protect his neck from further injury.58
During the second game of his senior season, Michael's neck roll was torn off his shoulder pads and was damaged to the extent it could not be reattached. During halftime of the game, Michael inquired about an extra neck roll with the student trainer, who indicated that there were none. Michael did not ask any of the coaches for a neck roll and returned to play in the third quarter without a neck roll. After making an interception, Michael was tackled by the face mask during the return and sustained a ruptured disc at C4-5. Michael was treated with a discectomy and fusion.
Michael filed suit against his high school football coach and the school board as a result of the injuries he sustained. At trial, the court found the coach and staff negligent for failing to require a "player to wear available protective equipment to minimize the risk of a player being injured when tackled, even by actions that violate game rules, such as the ‘face mask' and ‘late hit' infractions for which penalty flags are thrown."59 The judgment totaled $215,000 including $35,000 for "loss of opportunity to play college football." The total judgment was reduced by 20% for Michael's portion of his comparative fault.60
Maldonado v. Gateway Hotel Holdings, L.L.C.
A 23-year-old professional boxer, Fernando Maldonado, was knocked out in a fight at the Gateway Hotel in St. Louis in 1999. After being revived, Maldonado walked to his dressing room, where he lost consciousness. There was no ambulance on-site or on standby, nor was medical monitoring provided. Maldonado alleged that the hotel, as the landowner, failed to have an ambulance and medical monitoring on-site, which delayed his treatment, thereby causing significant brain injury and numerous motor and cognitive deficits. The jury found the hotel negligent and awarded $13.7 million in compensatory damages. Although a request for punitive damages was not made, the jury, on its own, assessed punitive damages in the amount of $27.4 million to the verdict, which was later struck by the judge.61
Cerny v. Cedar Bluffs Junior/Senior Public School
In September 1995, Brent Cerny struck his head against the ground while attempting to make a tackle in a football game. Reports indicated that Cerny was dizzy and disoriented but remained in the game for a couple of plays before taking himself out. Cerny returned to the game in the third quarter and played to its conclusion. He participated in practice the following week and was injured again when his helmet struck another player during practice drills. Cerny's doctor testified that he suffered a closed head injury with second concussion syndrome.
In his lawsuit, Cerny advanced several theories of negligence against his coach, including failing to adequately examine, failing to obtain qualified medical attention, and improperly allowing him to return to play. Critical testimony during the trial was conflicting. The judge found that the coach's conduct in evaluating Cerny and permitting him to reenter the game and participate in subsequent practices was consistent with what a reasonable coach would do under like or similar circumstances. The judge's verdict found that the coach was not negligent.62
Pinson v. State of Tennessee
In 1984, Michael Pinson received a blow to his head in a football practice. Shortly afterward, he collapsed and remained unconscious for 10 minutes. The school's athletic trainer examined Pinson and found facial palsy; no control on the left side of the body; unequal pupils; and no response to pain, sound, or movement. Pinson was thereafter immediately rushed to the hospital. The team trainer did not accompany Pinson to the hospital and instead sent a student trainer. Hospital records revealed that the student trainer informed hospital personnel that Pinson had been unconscious for 2 minutes. The school's trainer later appeared at the hospital but never conveyed to hospital personnel the significant neurological findings he had made on the field. Pinson's subsequent symptoms of headache, known by the trainer, together with the trainer's original findings, were never relayed to Pinson's treating doctor, who ultimately allowed Pinson to return to play.
Three weeks after the concussion, Pinson was "kicked in the head" and collapsed unconscious at practice. Surgery revealed a chronic subdural hematoma that had been present likely for 3 to 4 weeks. Pinson remained in a coma for several weeks following his brain surgery and became hemiparetic.
At a commissioner's trial, the school's trainer was found negligent for failing to communicate Pinson's neurological signs and symptoms to the emergency room and treating physician. Damages of $300,000 were assessed against the school trainer and the school.63
Rosada v. State of New York
John Rosado, a state detainee, filed suit against the state as a result of a fractured skull he sustained when he fell while playing basketball at the detention center. Rosado alleged that the state was negligent for using concrete floors instead of hardwood. The court found that no duty existed to use wooden basketball floors, and judgment was entered against Rosado.64
Regan v. State of New York
In Regan v. State of New York, a young college rugby player suffered a broken neck while practicing as a member of the rugby club and was rendered quadriplegic. The player filed a lawsuit against the state university alleging inter alia, negligent supervision of the practice. The court dismissed the claim, finding that the player had assumed the risk of "those injury-causing events which are known, apparent, or reasonably foreseeable consequences of their own participation."65
Lessons to Be Learned
As demonstrated by the previously discussed cases, the application of the law is not a mechanical approach. The outcome of each case is dependent on its own unique facts. As such, there is no bright-line rule or specific course of conduct that the law prescribes to avoid liability completely. As in all negligence claims, in a claim against a medical provider or responsible person involving a sport-related injury, the defendant will be evaluated under the "reasonable person" standard. Thus, in order to avoid liability, she must act as a reasonable medical provider, trainer, coach, or other professional would under the same or similar circumstances.
Read more from Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes, and Arthur L. Day.
Neurological hand injuries in bowling
Bowling can be traced back more than 5,000 years ago to Egypt. In the 1930s, a British anthropologist named Sir Flinders Petrie discovered a collection of objects in a child’s tomb in Egypt that appeared to have been used for a primitive form of bowling.
Bowling can be traced back more than 5,000 years ago to Egypt. In the 1930s, a British anthropologist named Sir Flinders Petrie discovered a collection of objects in a child's tomb in Egypt that appeared to have been used for a primitive form of bowling. A crude version of a bowling ball and primitive pins were all sized for a child. A similar game evolved during the Roman Empire that entailed tossing stone objects as close as possible to other stone objects. This game became popular with soldiers and eventually evolved into Italian bocce (considered a form of outdoor bowling). The game has continued to evolve and today is a sport enjoyed by more than 100 million people in more than 90 countries each year and is considered a timeless sport.[ 97]
Although not typically thought of as a sport with a high risk of injury, bowling can be both physically and psychologically demanding. Tremendous force is applied to the body throughout a bowler's stance, approach, pivot step, arm swing, release, and follow-through. Repetitive stress is applied to the entire upper extremity including the fingers, wrist, and elbow. Injuries may vary by age as well. A recent study examined bowling-related injuries presenting to U.S. emergency departments between 1990 and 2008.[ 162] The authors analyzed data from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission's National Electronic Injury Surveillance System and found that children younger than 7 years had a higher proportion of finger injuries and injuries from dropping the ball than individuals older than 7 years. On the other hand, bowlers more than 65 years old sustained a greater proportion of injuries related to falling, slipping, or tripping.
While the annual incidence of injury is extremely low, the sport can cause a spectrum of neurologic hand and upper extremity injuries, either acute or due to overuse. Injuries to the fingers and digital nerves can occur. One report described a bowler with a rare traumatic dislocation of the four long fingers.[197] More commonly, though, the repetitive nature of bowling can lead to injuries to the digital nerve of the thumb, which most bowlers place inside the ball holes; this is referred to as "cherry pitter's thumb"[337] (figure 1.2). Perineural fibrosis of the digital nerve of the thumb[297, 351] and even cases of thumb neuromas have been described.[164, 165] Dobyns and colleagues reported on one of the largest series of these patients.[78] Patients may present with a positive Tinel's sign and skin atrophy or callusing over the neuroma. The nerve may ultimately become atrophied with fibrous tissue proliferation at the site of injury. Not to be forgotten, neck and back pain can also occur in bowling and is often the result of discogenic injury.[ 228]
http://www.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/129/E5835_467544_ebook_Main.jpg
http://www.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/129/E5835_467545_ebook_Main.jpg
Bowler's thumb. This patient was taken to surgery because he did not respond to conservative therapy after a clinical diagnosis of bowler's thumb. At surgery, the digital nerve was markedly enlarged secondary to perineural fibrosis. (a) The enlarged ulnar digital nerve (arrows) is surrounded by perineural fibrosis producing an irregular rather than a normal smooth contour. Definitive surgical therapy consisted of neurolysis with careful removal of perineural fibrotic tissue. (b) The nerve is smaller and has a smoother contour following neurolysis. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was able to eventually return to bowling.
Reprinted from M.F. Showalter, D.H. Flemming, and S.A. Bernard, 2010, "MRI manifestations of bowler's thumb," Radiology Case Reports 6: 458. By permission of D.H. Flemming.
Read more from Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes, and Arthur L. Day.
Injuries to the cervical nerve root and brachial plexus neurapraxia
Cervical nerve root and brachial plexus neurapraxia are known by several colloquialisms, such as "burners" or "stingers." Stretching of the upper trunk of the brachial plexus accounts for the majority of these syndromes.
Cervical nerve root and brachial plexus neurapraxia are known by several colloquialisms, such as "burners" or "stingers." Stretching of the upper trunk of the brachial plexus accounts for the majority of these syndromes. Downward traction of the shoulder associated with lateral flexion of the neck to the opposite side is the proposed mechanism of injury in many cases. A similar pattern can be seen with a direct injury to the plexus by an external force applied to the supraclavicular area. The neurologic deficit in almost all of these cases includes the upper portion of the plexus, with weakness of the deltoid, biceps, and shoulder rotator muscles, and numbness extending down to the thumb and index finger (figure 16.4).
http://www.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/129/E5835_467731_ebook_Main.jpg
Plexus or root injuries. (a) Schematic: brachial plexus. Note its origins from the C5 through T1 nerve roots. UT = upper trunk, formed by a merger of the anterior divisions of the C5 and C6 roots. (b) Mechanisms of plexus versus root injury: The superior position of the upper trunk makes it most vulnerable to direct blows or stretching from distraction of the neck away from the shoulder. In contrast, a root may also be injured by lateral flexion of the neck toward the side of symptoms, associated with foraminal narrowing, especially in the presence of an underlying disc herniation or osteophyte.
Any other pattern of radicular symptoms is more suggestive of an isolated nerve root injury. The C5 and C6 nerve roots are most commonly affected, due to transient neural foraminal narrowing from a compressive axial force. An underlying osteophyte or disc rupture is identified in many of these cases.
Read more from Handbook of Neurological Sports Medicine by Anthony L. Petraglia, Julian E. Bailes, and Arthur L. Day.